Sunday, 17 November 2013
Saturday, 16 November 2013
Some thoughts for Today, Romans 8
Romans
8
New American Standard Bible (NASB)
Deliverance from Bondage
8 Therefore there is now no condemnation
for those who are in Christ Jesus. 2 For the
law of the Spirit of life [a]in Christ Jesus has set
you free from the law of sin and of death. 3 For what
the Law could not do, [b]weak as it was through the flesh,
God did: sending His own Son in the likeness of [c]sinful flesh and as an
offering for sin, He condemned sin in the flesh, 4 so
that the requirement of the Law might be fulfilled in us, who do not
walk according to the flesh but according to the Spirit. 5 For
those who are according to the flesh set their minds on the things of the
flesh, but those who are according to the Spirit, the things of the
Spirit. 6 For the mind set on the flesh is death,
but the mind set on the Spirit is life and peace, 7 because
the mind set on the flesh toward God; for it does not subject itself to
the law of God, for it is not even able to do so, 8 and
those who are in the flesh cannot please God.
9 However, you are not in the flesh
but in the Spirit, if indeed the Spirit of God dwells in you. But if
anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he does not belong to Him. 10 If
Christ is in you, though the body is dead because of sin, yet the spirit is [d]alive because of righteousness. 11 But
if the Spirit of Him who raised Jesus from the dead dwells in you, He
who raised Christ Jesus from the dead will also give life to your mortal
bodies [e]through His Spirit who dwells in
you.
12 So then, brethren, we are under
obligation, not to the flesh, to live according to the flesh— 13 for if
you are living according to the flesh, you [f]must die; but if by the Spirit you
are putting to death the deeds of the body, you will live. 14 For
all who are being led by the Spirit of God, these are sons of God. 15 For
you have not received a spirit of slavery [g]leading to fear again, but you have
received [h]a spirit of adoption as sons by
which we cry out, “Abba! Father!” 16 The Spirit
Himself testifies with our spirit that we are children of God, 17 and
if children, heirs also, heirs of God and fellow heirs with Christ, if
indeed we suffer with Him so that we may also be glorified
with Him.
18 For I consider that the sufferings of
this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory that
is to be revealed to us. 19 For the anxious
longing of the creation waits eagerly for the revealing of the sons
of God. 20 For the creation was subjected
tofutility, not willingly, but because of Him who subjected it, [i]in hope 21 that the
creation itself also will be set free from its slavery to corruption into the
freedom of the glory of the children of God. 22 For
we know that the whole creation groans and suffers the pains of childbirth
together until now. 23 And not only this, but also
we ourselves, having the first fruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan
within ourselves, waiting eagerly for our adoption as sons, the
redemption of our body. 24 For in hope we have
been saved, but hope that is seen is not hope; for who hopes for what he already sees? 25 But if
we hope for what we do not see, with perseverance we wait eagerly for it.
Our Victory in Christ
26 In the same way the Spirit also helps
our weakness; for we do not know how to pray as we should, but the
Spirit Himself intercedes for us with groanings too deep for
words; 27 and He who searches the hearts knows
what the mind of the Spirit is, because He intercedes for the [j]saints according to the
will of God.
28 And we know that [k]God causes all things to work
together for good to those who love God, to those who are called according
to His purpose. 29 For those whom
He foreknew, He also predestined to become conformed to
the image of His Son, so that He would be the firstborn among many brethren; 30 and
these whom He predestined, He also called; and these whom He called,
He also justified; and these whom He justified, He also glorified.
31 What then shall we say to these things? If
God is for us, who is against us? 32 He
who did not spare His own Son, but delivered Him over for us all, how
will He not also with Him freely give us all things? 33 Who
will bring a charge against God’s elect? God is the one who
justifies; 34 who is the one who condemns?
Christ Jesus is He who died, yes, rather who was [l]raised, who is at the right
hand of God, who also intercedes for us. 35 Who
will separate us from the love of [m]Christ? Will tribulation, or
distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or
sword?
36 Just as it is written,
“For Your
sake we are being put to death all day long;
We were considered as sheep to be slaughtered.”
We were considered as sheep to be slaughtered.”
37 But in all these things we
overwhelmingly conquer through Him who loved us. 38 For
I am convinced that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor
principalities, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers, 39 nor
height, nor depth, nor any other created thing, will be able to separate us
from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord
NIV
Application Commentary
Paul
concludes his celebration of God’s love for us in Christ with his own personal
testimony: “I am persuaded.…” The list following is arranged in four pairs,
with “powers” thrown in between the third and fourth pair. We can easily “over interpret”
such a list, insisting on a precision of definitions that misses the point of
Paul’s rhetoric. In general, however, “death” and “life” refer to the two basic
states of human existence. “Angels” and “demons” (archai, i.e., “rulers,” which
Paul uses to denote evil spiritual beings [see Eph. 6:12; Col. 2:15]) summarize
the entirety of the spiritual world.
A
few interpreters take “present things” and “coming things” (lit. trans.) as
spiritual beings too, but evidence is lacking for these as such titles.
Probably Paul chooses to summarize all of history, along with the people and
events it contains, in a temporal perspective. It is not clear why Paul
disrupts his neat parallelism with the word “powers” at this point, but the
word refers again to spiritual beings (1 Cor. 15:24; Eph. 1:21).
“Height”
and “depth” are the most difficult of the pairs of terms to identify. Since
these words were applied to the space above and below the horizon, and since
ancient people often invested celestial phenomena with spiritual significance,
Paul may be referring to spiritual beings again. Yet Paul uses similar language
in Ephesians 3:18 in a simple spatial sense. Thus, perhaps, he chooses yet
another way of trying to help us understand that there is nothing in all the
world—whether we are dead or alive, whether they are things we now face or
things we will face in the future, whether they are above us or below us—that
can separate us from the “love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord.” As the
chapter began with “no condemnation” (Rom. 8:1), so it ends with the bookends
of “no separation” (8:35, 39).
From
NIVAC: Romans by Douglas J. Moo. Published by Zondervan Academic.
Monday, 11 November 2013
Pentecostal Pilgrim: Celebrating My Heritage
Pentecostal Pilgrim: Celebrating My Heritage: My plan is to use this blog partly to engage in personal critical reflection on pentecostalism (note: critical here does not mean only sayin...
Sunday, 10 November 2013
No more Namby Pamby Christianity
- Too long have we been waiting for one another to begin! The time of waiting is past! The hour of God has struck! War is declared! In God's Holy Name let us arise and build! 'The God of Heaven, He will fight for us', as we for Him. We will not build on the sand, but on the bedrock of the sayings of Christ, and the gates and minions of hell shall not prevail against us. Should such men as we fear? Before the world, aye, before the sleepy, lukewarm, faithless, namby-pamby Christian world, we will dare to trust our God, we will venture our all for Him, we will live and we will die for Him, and we will do it with His joy unspeakable singing aloud in our hearts. We will a thousand times sooner die trusting only our God, than live trusting in man. And when we come to this position the battle is already won, and the end of the glorious campaign in sight. We will have the real Holiness of God, not the sickly stuff of talk and dainty words and pretty thoughts; we will have a Masculine Holiness, one of daring faith and works for Jesus Christ.
Saturday, 9 November 2013
Thursday, 7 November 2013
Views, Visions and Values.: Blackpool Rocks, What I learned on a trip to Blac...
Views, Visions and Values.: Blackpool Rocks, What I learned on a trip to Blac...: On Monday, I decided after a few tough weeks, that I needed a change of scene and considered what I could do, I did consi...
Wednesday, 23 October 2013
Saturday, 19 October 2013
Tuesday, 8 October 2013
Different Kingdom: The Importance of Changing Beliefs
Different Kingdom: The Importance of Changing Beliefs: Some time ago I heard it suggested that leaders who changed their beliefs were unreliable leaders; that to change your mind about something ...
Monday, 7 October 2013
Britain has no obligation to help Syrian refugees
WITH the French riot police standing near there is a palpable sense of tension in the air.
By: Leo McKinstry
24Comments
Some of the protesters have gone on hunger strike; others have blocked a passenger walkway; a few threaten to kill themselves. This is the scene unfolding at the ferry terminal in Calais where a large group of Syrians are mounting a demonstration to demand entry to Britain as refugees.
Some might say that this protest shows the tragic impact of the civil war in Syria. But that is to draw entirely the wrong lesson. For what the Calais stand-off really shows is how Britain is viewed as a soft-touch right across the globe. Thanks to lax borders, the human rights industry, the state's obsession with multiculturalism and our obscenely generous welfare system, our country has become the world's capital for freeloaders. The group at Calais is a symbol, not of Syria's inhumanity but of Britain's utterly chaotic, self-destructive immigration policy. The protesters' demand for asylum could hardly be less convincing. If they were really just fleeing persecution they would have sought sanctuary anywhere outside Syria.
Indeed, under the laws of both the UN and the EU, refugees are not entitled to claim asylum except in the first safe country they reach. But these Syrians have travelled across Europe, through a host of stable nations, because they only want to come to Britain.
They are not interested in settling anywhere else. One admitted that he had gone through Jordan, Egypt, Greece, Serbia, Montenegro and Italy before arriving at Calais. It shows how it is the lure of Britain that drives them. "Once there, we will be well treated and can bring our families too," says another.
Britain's reputation as an easy, subsidy-rich haven has been created through years of mismanagement and misguided ideology. The Syrian asylum seekers are absolutely right to think that once they make it to Britain they will never have to leave, no matter how bogus their claims.
The administration of the asylum system remains a shambles, with a backlog of more than 350,000 cases. The 1998 Human Rights Act has made it excessively difficult to deport illegal immigrants, even when they have committed serious crimes.
Nor are the Syrian protesters wrong to think that they will be supported by the British state on a scale far beyond anything that could be experienced in the Middle East.
In most European countries, welfare handouts are based on past contributions through taxes and insurance. But here social security is based largely on need so even foreigners who may have given nothing to our society are entitled to lavish claims. That is why our benefits system has become such a honeypot for parasites.
The idea that all immigrants come here to work is a myth cultivated by the Left. In fact, according to the latest figures, there are 407,000 foreign nationals here living on benefits, while more than 10 per cent of the entire social housing stock goes to foreigners.
Apart from money, the other great attraction for asylum seekers and other migrants is that there is no pressure on them to integrate into our society.
Thanks to the pernicious doctrine of multi-culturalism the impulse to uphold our British identity and heritage is treated as a form of racism. So new arrivals are encouraged to cling to the customs, superstition, and even language of their homeland, while developing their own enclaves in our urban areas.
Some might say that this protest shows the tragic impact of the civil war in Syria. But that is to draw entirely the wrong lesson. For what the Calais stand-off really shows is how Britain is viewed as a soft-touch right across the globe. Thanks to lax borders, the human rights industry, the state's obsession with multiculturalism and our obscenely generous welfare system, our country has become the world's capital for freeloaders. The group at Calais is a symbol, not of Syria's inhumanity but of Britain's utterly chaotic, self-destructive immigration policy. The protesters' demand for asylum could hardly be less convincing. If they were really just fleeing persecution they would have sought sanctuary anywhere outside Syria.
Indeed, under the laws of both the UN and the EU, refugees are not entitled to claim asylum except in the first safe country they reach. But these Syrians have travelled across Europe, through a host of stable nations, because they only want to come to Britain.
They are not interested in settling anywhere else. One admitted that he had gone through Jordan, Egypt, Greece, Serbia, Montenegro and Italy before arriving at Calais. It shows how it is the lure of Britain that drives them. "Once there, we will be well treated and can bring our families too," says another.
Britain's reputation as an easy, subsidy-rich haven has been created through years of mismanagement and misguided ideology. The Syrian asylum seekers are absolutely right to think that once they make it to Britain they will never have to leave, no matter how bogus their claims.
The administration of the asylum system remains a shambles, with a backlog of more than 350,000 cases. The 1998 Human Rights Act has made it excessively difficult to deport illegal immigrants, even when they have committed serious crimes.
Nor are the Syrian protesters wrong to think that they will be supported by the British state on a scale far beyond anything that could be experienced in the Middle East.
In most European countries, welfare handouts are based on past contributions through taxes and insurance. But here social security is based largely on need so even foreigners who may have given nothing to our society are entitled to lavish claims. That is why our benefits system has become such a honeypot for parasites.
The idea that all immigrants come here to work is a myth cultivated by the Left. In fact, according to the latest figures, there are 407,000 foreign nationals here living on benefits, while more than 10 per cent of the entire social housing stock goes to foreigners.
Apart from money, the other great attraction for asylum seekers and other migrants is that there is no pressure on them to integrate into our society.
Thanks to the pernicious doctrine of multi-culturalism the impulse to uphold our British identity and heritage is treated as a form of racism. So new arrivals are encouraged to cling to the customs, superstition, and even language of their homeland, while developing their own enclaves in our urban areas.
Benefits system has become a honeypot
Much of this cultural baggage is deeply misogynistic, as we see in the current controversies over the Islamic veil, sharia law, female genital mutilation and forced marriages. But then misogyny is all too apparent in the hordes of asylum seekers that have continually gathered at Calais in recent years. Tough young men predominate, a complete inversion of the traditional civilised doctrine that, in any bid for safety, women and children should come first. If the persecution these men are fleeing is so terrible, why did they leave their wives and families behind?
It would be absurd to cave in to the emotive blackmail from the Syrian protesters. We have no responsibility towards them, just as we had no duty to become involved in their country's civil war. We should be neither the world's moral policeman nor its social worker. If we tolerated such a step it would only open us up to a new tidal wave of asylum claims at the very moment when we face a vast influx of migrants from Bulgaria and Romania.
Britain has always been renowned for tolerance.
But that open spirit has been grievously exploited in recent years leading to profound public disillusion with the process of asylum and immigration. The overwhelming majority of so-called "refugees" have turned out to be economic migrants with no right to be here. As a result, the very term "asylum-seeker" has been badly tarnished.
That despair has been exacerbated by an extraordinary catalogue of crimes perpetrated by asylum seekers, most notoriously in the killing of police officer Sharon Beshenivsky in 2005 by two Somalians. On a wider level police figures for 2011 show that one-fifth of all people charged with rape or murder were immigrants.
It is no wonder that there is a profound feeling of social dislocation in Britain. We should not add to it by opening our doors even more widely.
Britain has always been renowned for tolerance.
But that open spirit has been grievously exploited in recent years leading to profound public disillusion with the process of asylum and immigration. The overwhelming majority of so-called "refugees" have turned out to be economic migrants with no right to be here. As a result, the very term "asylum-seeker" has been badly tarnished.
That despair has been exacerbated by an extraordinary catalogue of crimes perpetrated by asylum seekers, most notoriously in the killing of police officer Sharon Beshenivsky in 2005 by two Somalians. On a wider level police figures for 2011 show that one-fifth of all people charged with rape or murder were immigrants.
It is no wonder that there is a profound feeling of social dislocation in Britain. We should not add to it by opening our doors even more widely.
Different Kingdom: The Theological Journey - We All Do Theology!
Different Kingdom: The Theological Journey - We All Do Theology!: A few posts back I outlined what I think have been the 4 journeys - or, more accurately, the 4 aspects of the one journey - that I think so...
Sunday, 6 October 2013
Friday, 4 October 2013
Different Kingdom: Connections and Covenant
Different Kingdom: Connections and Covenant: Oh dear! A week has gone by and I haven't posted! Thank God I am free from guilt. I just wanted to post one more thought on connection b...
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
Today's post
Jesus Christ, The Same Yesterday, Today and Forever
I had the privilege to be raised in a Christian Home and had the input of my parents and grandparents into my life, they were ...
-
Recently, I have found that I have a lot of free time, due to circumstances, although I have been spending time with some ...
-
Living a Life without Limits. I’m going to ask you to think about this question and I would like you to pray abou...