Sunday, 12 January 2014

She fought on the Somme disguised as a Tommy, so why did Dorothy die unloved and unlauded in a lunatic asylum? Incredible story of the only British woman to fight in the trenches, Daily Mail


Perfect cover: Dorothy in her military uniform
Perfect cover: Dorothy in her military uniform
In Paris, in the high summer of 1915, Dorothy Lawrence – a young Englishwoman with more by way of courage and ambition than wealth or  connections – turned herself into a Tommy.
She flattened her hourglass curves with a home-made  corset stuffed with cotton-wool, hacked off her long, brown hair and darkened her complexion with Condy’s Fluid, a disinfectant made from potassium permanganate. She even razored the pale skin of her cheeks in the hope of giving herself a shaving rash.
In a borrowed military uniform she disguised the last vestiges of her female shape and found two British soldiers to teach her to walk like a man. She completed her transformation by forging her own bona fides and travel permits for  war-ravaged France and caught a train to Amiens.
And then Dorothy Lawrence, a cub reporter who hungered to be a war correspondent, cycled to Albert, the village known  as the front of the Front, and joined the ranks of 179 Tunnelling Company, 51st Division, Royal Engineers, as they dug beneath no-man’s-land and across to German lines.
They kept her presence a secret. ‘You don’t know what danger you are in,’ Sapper Tommy Dunn warned her, meaning from the battle-hardened, woman-starved men of her own side, not the enemy mortars.
What he could not have known was the terrible secret which had driven Dorothy to take such risks. Ten years later she would reveal she had been raped as a child by the ‘highly respected’ church guardian who had raised her after she was orphaned.
For almost two weeks in August 1915, Dorothy toiled in the sniper-infested trenches of the Somme – which a year later were to erupt in the bloody hell immortalised by the Sebastian Faulks novel Birdsong – until, weakened by contaminated water and exhaustion, she revealed herself to be a female civilian to her ‘superiors’.
She knew she had the scoop of her life, a story which would set Fleet Street alight.
Even when the British military locked her in a convent to keep her quiet in the final days before the Battle of Loos the following month, she was confident it would make her name.
 
Emmeline Pankhurst, leader of the Suffragettes, agreed. After a chance encounter on the ferry home, she invited Dorothy to lecture the growing ranks of women desperate to contribute to Britain’s war effort. But Dorothy was banned by the War Office from telling her inspirational story either through newspaper articles or talks until after the Armistice in 1918. 
Dorothy braved dreadful conditions on the Front, joining British soldiers in trenches near Albert in 1916
Dorothy braved dreadful conditions on the Front, joining British soldiers in trenches near Albert in 1916
By the time her book, Sapper Dorothy Lawrence, The Only English Woman Soldier, appeared in 1919 it was well received in England, America and Australia, but remaindered within a year as a world exhausted by war looked ahead to the glamour of the Roaring Twenties.
It left Dorothy with neither reputation nor income, and by 1925 she was living in rented rooms in Islington, North London, her behaviour increasingly erratic. With no family to look after her, she was taken into care, and committed first to the London County Mental Hospital and then Colney Hatch Lunatic Asylum.
It was here she revealed the tragedy of her broken childhood to doctors – but there is no evidence her allegations were taken seriously and investigated as they would be today.
Dorothy was in hospital for a shocking 39 years until her lonely death in the asylum in 1964
Dorothy was in hospital for a shocking 39 years until her lonely death in the asylum in 1964
It is even possible she was declared insane because she dared to air them publicly. A century ago the word of a man of the Church would have been believed over that of a woman capable of something The Spectator described in its September 1919 review of her book as a ‘girlish freak’.
Dorothy was in hospital for a shocking 39 years until her lonely death in the asylum in 1964. She was buried in a pauper’s grave in New Southgate Cemetery, where the site of her plot is no longer clear.
It was a tragic end to what could have been a brilliant life in the vanguard of women’s journalism. Today, however, as Britain prepares to mark the centenary of the First World War, her exploits are finally being applauded.
Military historian Simon Jones  stumbled across a copy of her long-forgotten book while working at  the Royal Engineers Museum in Chatham, Kent, ten years ago and is now writing her biography.
With his help, The Mail on Sunday has pieced together fragments of Dorothy’s personal and professional life – and can reveal for the first time that her rape allegations were sufficiently compelling to be included in her medical records, held in the London Metropolitan Archives.
‘At the time she was committed her account of the rape was seen as manic behaviour, delusional, but if it was true it might go some way to explaining why she did what she did,’ Simon says.
‘We know today that victims of sexual abuse do not value their own wellbeing – did Dorothy deliberately put herself in danger? If she understood the danger she was in, she did not seem to fear it. Albert in those days was somewhere soldiers tried to avoid – they would even deliberately injure themselves – yet she headed straight for it.’
Simon has, however, been frustrated by the mysteries of Dorothy’s early and later life.
Her adventures in 1915 are clearly told – although he believes they benefit from a bit of spin – but her early years remain an enigma and, as a mental patient, little is known about her from 1925 onwards.
Dorothy resolved to cover the fighting on the Western Front but was ridiculed by editors unable to secure access for seasoned foreign correspondents
Dorothy resolved to cover the fighting on the Western Front but was ridiculed by editors unable to secure access for seasoned foreign correspondents
He believes she was born in Hendon, North London, at the end of the 1880s to an unmarried mother who used several aliases.
When her mother died, Dorothy – then aged around 13 or 14 – was handed into the care of a churchman. Dorothy describes him as ‘highly respected’ and says she was raised in ‘one of England’s cathedral cities’. Simon has traced this to  South-West England.
By the outbreak of war she was scratching a living as a journalist in London.
She resolved to cover the fighting on the Western Front but was ridiculed by editors unable to secure access for seasoned foreign correspondents.
‘I’ll see what an ordinary English girl can accomplish,’ she wrote.
‘I’ll see whether I can go one better than these big men with their cars, credentials and money .  .  . I’ll be hanged if I don’t try.’
And so she did, befriending the soldiers in Paris – her ‘khaki accomplices’, as she nicknames them – who would enable her to pass herself off as a Tommy. 
After ten days on the front line Dorothy began to suffer fainting fits. She feared that if she were found unconscious her sex would immediately be revealed
After ten days on the front line Dorothy began to suffer fainting fits. She feared that if she were found unconscious her sex would immediately be revealed
Rebecca Nash, curator of the Royal Engineers Museum explains: ‘The sappers’ uniform would have given Dorothy some leeway to move around – tunnellers had a kind of right to roam. They were not subject to the same military strictures as infantry soldiers, for example, and would often turn up without the  commanding officer of an infantry regiment having been informed.  It was the perfect cover.’
What was also perfect was meeting Sapper Tommy Dunn on the road to Albert. Beguiled by Dorothy’s mad bravery, he resolved to protect her, hiding her in an abandoned cottage until 179 Company troop moved up and she was able to camouflage herself among his comrades. What happened next is open to academic debate. Simon Jones is Britain’s foremost expert on the Somme tunnels, and he is not convinced by Dorothy’s account. He reveals: ‘I am sceptical of the passages in the book in which Dorothy talks of tunnelling under the front line, but there is no doubt whatsoever that she was in the trenches and that she was disguised as a man.’
His conviction is backed by Rebecca Nash. It is further corroborated by letters in the Imperial War Museum archive from Sir Walter Kirke, of the British Expeditionary Force’s secret service, which speak of a young female journalist disguised as a man on the front line.
After ten days Dorothy began to suffer fainting  fits. She feared that if she were found unconscious her sex would immediately be revealed, compromising Sapper Dunn and  others harbouring her.
She gave herself up, only to have a fit of  the giggles while being interrogated by the colonel: ‘I really could not help it,’ she wrote. 
Dorothy, who hungered to be a war correspondent, cycled to Albert, the village known as the front of the Front, and joined the ranks of 179 Tunnelling Company, 51st Division, Royal Engineers
Dorothy, who hungered to be a war correspondent, cycled to Albert, the village known as the front of the Front, and joined the ranks of 179 Tunnelling Company, 51st Division, Royal Engineers
‘So utterly ludicrous appeared this betrousered little female, marshalled solemnly by three soldiers and deposited before 20 embarrassed men.’
She was sent down the line to Third Army headquarters and subject to  a quasi court martial by three generals, who had her locked in a local convent until she could be put on a ferry back across the Channel.
Correspondence held by the Harry Ransom Centre in the University of Texas in Austin includes a letter from Dorothy saying she had had to scrap her first book on the instructions of the War Office, which seems to have invoked the 1914 Defence of the Realm Act to silence her. The letter is on the headed notepaper of The Wide World Magazine, a London-based illustrated monthly where Dorothy appears to have worked.
But even with this journalistic break Dorothy was unable to  parlay her experiences and talent into a successful career.
Nor is there any record of her marrying, so when her mental health failed she was incarcerated without argument for the rest of  her life.
It’s only now, as Britain commemorates the centenary of the Great War, that her unique part in it is being officially recognised with a mention in the new gallery at the Imperial War Museum, which will open this summer.
Curator Laura Clouting said: ‘This was a time when there was no provision for women to join any branch of the Services and they weren’t even able to work in munitions factories. Mostly they were involved in charity fundraising or succumbed to knitting mania.
‘We’re including Dorothy Lawrence because she proved the exception to the rule.’
So although she left little trace – no family papers or albums of photographs, and of course, no descendants to celebrate her achievement – 100 years after Dorothy Lawrence became a Sapper on the Somme, her place in history is finally secured.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2537793/She-fought-Somme-disguised-Tommy-did-Dorothy-die-unloved-unlauded-lunatic-asylum-Incredible-story-British-woman-fight-trenches.html#ixzz2qCSFVR6n
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Robert Downey Jr Sings With Sting And Absolutely Kills It

Words for The Wise, Hebrews 2 New American Standard Bible (NASB) Give Heed to Salvation






For this reason we must pay much closer attention to [a]what we have heard, so that we do not drift away from it. For if the word spoken through angels proved[b]unalterable, and every transgression and disobedience received a just [c]penalty,how will we escape if we neglect so great a salvation? [d]After it was at the first spoken through the Lord, it was confirmed to us by those who heard, God also testifying with them, both by signs and wonders and by various [e]miracles and by[f]gifts of the Holy Spirit according to His own will.

Earth Subject to Man

For He did not subject to angels [g]the world to come, concerning which we are speaking. But one has testified somewhere, saying,
What is man, that You remember him?
Or the son of man, that You are concerned about him?
You have made him [h]for a little while lower than the angels;
You have crowned him with glory and honor,
[i]And have appointed him over the works of Your hands;
You have put all things in subjection under his feet.”
For in subjecting all things to him, He left nothing that is not subject to him. But now we do not yet see all things subjected to him.

Jesus Briefly Humbled
But we do see Him who was made [j]for a little while lower than the angels, namely, Jesus, because of the suffering of death crowned with glory and honor, so that by the grace of God He might taste death for everyone.
10 For it was fitting for Him, for whom are all things, and through whom are all things, in bringing many sons to glory, to perfect the [k]author of their salvation through sufferings. 11 For both He who sanctifies and those who are [l]sanctified are all from one Father; for which reason He is not ashamed to call them brethren

12 saying,
“I will proclaim Your name to My brethren,
In the midst of the congregation I will sing Your praise.”
13 And again,
“I will put My trust in Him.”
And again,

Behold, I and the children whom God has given Me.”
14 Therefore, since the children share in [m]flesh and blood, He Himself likewise also partook of the same, that through death He might render powerless him who had the power of death, that is, the devil, 15 and might free those who through fear of death were subject to slavery all their lives. 16 For assuredly He does not [n]give help to angels, but He gives help to the [o]descendant of Abraham. 17 Therefore, He [p]had to be made like His brethren in all things, so that He might become a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make propitiation for the sins of the people.18 For since He Himself was tempted in that which He has suffered, He is able to come to the aid of those who are tempted.
Footnotes:
a.      Hebrews 2:1 Lit the things that have been heard
b.     Hebrews 2:2 Or steadfast
c.      Hebrews 2:2 Or recompense
d.     Hebrews 2:3 Lit Which was
e.     Hebrews 2:4 Or works of power
f.       Hebrews 2:4 Lit distributions
g.     Hebrews 2:5 Lit the inhabited earth
h.     Hebrews 2:7 Or ...him a little lower than...
i.       Hebrews 2:7 Two early mss do not contain And...hands
j.       Hebrews 2:9 Or a little lower
k.     Hebrews 2:10 Or leader
l.       Hebrews 2:11 Or being sanctified
m.  Hebrews 2:14 Lit blood and flesh
n.    Hebrews 2:16 Lit take hold of angels, but He takes hold of
o.    Hebrews 2:16 Lit seed
p.     Hebrews 2:17 Lit was obligated to be

1 Matthew Henry's Commentary

Verses 1-4

The apostle proceeds in the plain profitable method of doctrine, reason, and use, through this epistle. Here we have the application of the truths before asserted and proved; this is brought in by the illative particle therefore, with which this chapter begins, and which shows its connection with the former, where the apostle having proved Christ to be superior to the angels by whose ministry the law was given, and therefore that the gospel dispensation must be more excellent than the legal, he now comes to apply this doctrine both by way of exhortation and argument.

I. By way of exhortation: Therefore we ought to give the more diligent heed to the things which we have heard, Heb. 2:1. This is the first way by which we are to show our esteem of Christ and of the gospel. It is the great concern of every one under the gospel to give the most earnest heed to all gospel discoveries and directions, to prize them highly in his judgment as matters of the greatest importance, to hearken to them diligently in all the opportunities he has for that purpose, to read them frequently, to meditate on them closely, and to mix faith with them. We must embrace them in our hearts and affections, retain them in our memories, and finally regulate our words and actions according to them.

II. By way of argument, he adds strong motives to enforce the exhortation.

1.      From the great loss we shall sustain if we do not take this earnest heed to the things which we have heard: We shall let them slip. They will leak, and run out of our heads, lips, and lives, and we shall be great losers by our neglect. Learn, (1.) When we have received gospel truths into our minds, we are in danger of letting them slip. Our minds and memories are like a leaky vessel, they do not without much care retain what is poured into them; this proceeds from the corruption of our natures, the enmity and subtlety of Satan (he steals away the word), from the entanglements and snares of the world, the thorns that choke the good seed. (2.) Those meet with an inconceivable loss who let gospel truths, which they had received, slip out of their minds; they have lost a treasure far better than thousands of gold and silver; the seed is lost, their time and pains in hearing lost, and their hopes of a good harvest lost; all is lost, if the gospel be lost. (3.) This consideration should be a strong motive both to our attention to the gospel and our retention of it; and indeed, if we do not well attend, we shall not long retain the word of God; inattentive hearers will soon be forgetful hearers.
2.    Dictionary of Bible Themes
1444 revelation, in NT

The NT fulfils and completes the revelation of God which began in the OT. Jesus Christ is the central focus of this self-revelation of God.

The unity and progress of revelation

The unity of OT and NT Mt 5:17-18 See also Ro 3:21-222Ti 3:14-152Pe 3:15-16 The writings of Paul are presented as having equal status with the OT Scriptures; Rev 22:18-19 These sanctions have the same force as those of Dt 4:2; 12:32.

The progress of NT revelation Heb 1:1-2 See alsoHeb 2:1-4Heb 12:22-27
The NT fulfils and completes God’s revelation of himself

Jesus Christ is the supreme revelation of God Col 1:25-27 See also Jn 1:9-18Jn 14:6Ac 4:12Gal 4:4Php 2:6-8Heb 2:14

Jesus Christ is the image of God 2Co 4:4Col 1:15

Jesus Christ has the nature of God Php 2:6

Jesus Christ is the exact representation of GodHeb 1:3

Jesus Christ is the incarnate Word of God Jn 1:14

The role of the Holy Spirit in revelation

He is the divine agent of revelation Jn 16:12-15 See also Jn 14:16-17Jn 15:261Jn 4:61Jn 5:6Rev 2:7,11,17,29Rev 3:6,13,22

He is the source of revelatory manifestations 1Co 12:7-11 See also Ac 2:1-12Ro 12:61Co 12:28-30;1Co 13:8-121Co 14:1-33Eph 4:11

God’s purposes in revelation

To reveal himself in Jesus Christ Col 1:15-20 See also Jn 1:14Jn 12:44-45Jn 14:92Co 4:4Heb 1:3


To reveal his plan through Jesus Christ Eph 1:9-10See also Ro 16:25-271Co 2:7-10Eph 3:3-11Col 1:19-20


Fanny J Crosby’s Great Hymn

Redeemed, how I love to proclaim it!
Redeemed by the blood of the Lamb;
Redeemed through His infinite mercy,
His child and forever I am.

Refrain
Redeemed, redeemed,
Redeemed by the blood of the Lamb;
Redeemed, redeemed,
His child and forever I am.

Redeemed, and so happy in Jesus,
No language my rapture can tell;
I know that the light of His presence
With me doth continually dwell.

Refrain

I think of my blessèd Redeemer,
I think of Him all the day long:
I sing, for I cannot be silent;
His love is the theme of my song.

Refrain

I know there’s a crown that is waiting,
In yonder bright mansion for me,
And soon, with the spirits made perfect,
At home with the Lord I shall be.


Refrain

Yours by His Grace

Blair Humphreys

Southport.Merseyside

January 12th 2014

Saturday, 11 January 2014

Whom Shall I Fear [God of Angel Armies] [Lyrics]

The lions were not led by donkeys

The lions were not led by donkeys


PARODY Sir Tony Robinson and Rowan Atkinson as Baldrick and Blackadder

Think Benefits Street makes shocking TV? Try living there! A worrying dispatch from the once respectable street that's been making headlines all week, Daily Mail


  • Resident George Drummond used to be proud of the street where he lives
  • Not any more - the street features thieves, benefit cheats and child brides
George Drummond’s mid-terrace has what estate agents call ‘kerb appeal’. Neighbouring properties could do with a good lick of paint (and a lot more besides), but Mr Drummond’s home in James Turner Street, a brisk stroll from Birmingham city centre, is as neat as a pin, inside and out. 
The windows are spotless, the black and gold railings glisten in the winter sun, and his front garden, resplendent with potted plants and hanging baskets, could grace the Britain in Bloom contest.
‘I’m 83 and I have spent 53 years on this street,’ he said. ‘Always in this house.’ George Drummond is proud of his home, where he and his wife, a nurse, raised their three children. He is proud of his adopted country, having arrived here from Jamaica in the Fifties and spending the next 30-odd years as a bus driver, barely missing a day at the wheel. Once upon a time, he also used to be proud of the street where he has lived all his adult life. 
Stole £13,000: 'White Dee' (Deirdre Kelly) presents herself as a leader of the local community
Stole £13,000: 'White Dee' (Deirdre Kelly) presents herself as a leader of the local community
Anyone who tuned in to Channel 4 at 9pm on Monday will understand why that last sentence is in the past tense. For the row of Victorian terraces is now the subject of a controversial five-part series, called Benefits Street, which began this week. 
By the time the first instalment had finished (it was repeated on Wednesday), James Turner Street in the heart of Winson Green had become possibly the most infamous residential street in the country. 
The ‘majority’ of residents in the 99 addresses are living off the state, the programme-makers told us, before introducing a motley cast of characters who could have walked straight off the set of The Jeremy Kyle Show.
Recidivist ‘Danny’ (Danny Smith) admitted being too lazy to work and was filmed demonstrating the tricks of his trade as a shoplifter. Mark and Becky (Mark Thomas and Becky Howe) brazenly told how they had all their benefits stopped because of fraudulent claims. 
‘White Dee’ (Deidre Kelly) and ‘Black Dee’ (Dee Roberts), nicknamed by their neighbours on account of their colour, presented themselves as leaders of the local community.
 
But we now know the former is a convicted criminal who, when employed by the city council, stole cash set aside for vulnerable tenants; and the latter is on bail in connection with a racially aggravated incident in James Turner Street last August and a drugs bust last June.
Some 4.2 million viewers saw the opening episode of Benefits Street, making it the most popular show on Channel 4 for more than a year. 
But there was instant controversy. Channel 4 itself could now face a police probe following complaints from members of the public and local politicians that the broadcaster ‘aided and abetted shoplifting in Birmingham’ by letting Danny brag about his methods. 
And there were howls of protest from those who took part in the programme. Residents claimed TV bosses bribed them with cigarettes, beer and McDonalds meals. 
Recidivist 'Danny' (Danny Smith) admits he is too lazy to work and was filmed demonstrating shoplifting
Recidivist 'Danny' (Danny Smith) admits he is too lazy to work and was filmed demonstrating shoplifting
They said they were made to look like ‘complete scum’ because the way they were portrayed was ‘unfair and unrepresentative’. 
The MP Dame Anne Begg complained that the show was a ‘misrepresentation’ of life for people on social security, as it focuses almost exclusively on people receiving unemployment benefits, which make up only a small proportion of the overall social security bill.
More than 3,000 people signed an online petition calling on Channel 4 not to screen the rest of the series. But would those same people feel the same way if they saw James Turner Street through the eyes of George Drummond and the many other decent residents we spoke to this week, many of whom were too frightened to be identified?
On Thursday morning, for example, a typical sight greeted Mr Drummond when he opened his curtains. Just a few yards from his front door, an old mattress and other rubbish had appeared in the middle of the road, surrounded by broken glass, empty cans of super-strength lager and discarded vodka bottles. Nearby gardens resembled Steptoe’s yard, with chairs, beds and junk piled high.
Lead has been stolen from the chapel roof four times in recent months. The stained glass windows, one couldn’t help but notice, were covered by metal security grilles. 
Home Office figures reveal police were contacted about some form of crime in James Turner Street every month last year, including drug abuse, criminal damage, arson and anti-social behaviour. 
One elderly couple told how, not so long ago, someone poured acid over the plants in their front garden. 
Why would anyone do such a thing? Simply because they had politely refused to allow some young children from the street to play in their back garden unsupervised. 
‘We could never prove it but we knew it was to do with that,’ said the husband. ‘That what we’re up against here.’
Insurance companies demand prohibitive premiums for vehicle cover in B18 — the Winson Green postcode. 
‘When I lived in Edgbaston, my insurance on one car was £500 a year and £400 on the other,’ said a young father, who ran a takeaway business in another part of Birmingham before being re-housed here by the council. 
‘When I called to renew my policy last month, they told me it would now be £3,000 a year for one car and £4,000 for the other. All because we live in B18.’
Benefit cheats: Parents Mark Thomas and Becky Howe were picking up £1,500 a month in benefits
Benefit cheats: Parents Mark Thomas and Becky Howe were picking up £1,500 a month in benefits
His 12-year-old son, he said, is being singled out at school because of his address.
‘After the show went out, he got a text from a friend. It said: “Why didn’t you tell us you live on a bad street. You live on a thieves street, you are a thief. We won’t be your friend anymore. [sic]’’’
Indeed, James Turner Street has become a bizarre local attraction. Drivers have been spotted lowering their car windows to photograph the street sign on their mobile phones, just as they might with a famous landmark.
Yet perhaps the more depressing thing about the street is that in the Britain of today it is not especially unusual.
Figures for benefit claimants are not broken down street by street, so it is impossible to get an exact figure for the number of people receiving handouts in the road. 
It is worth stressing that it was ‘White Dee’, not the documentary-makers, who said: ‘Probably, five per cent of people on this road are working.’ And it was ‘Black Dee’ who was seen walking along, pointing at house after house, declaring almost triumphantly: ‘Unemployed, unemployed, unemployed.’ The narrator was more circumspect, saying only that the ‘majority’ of residents were on benefits of between £500 and £900 a month.
James Turner Street was chosen because it falls within Soho ward, part of the Ladywood parliamentary constituency. In Soho, 9.8 per cent of all residents of working age claim Jobseeker’s Allowance alone, which is more than three times the national average according to the most recent data. 
But in other wards the jobless figure is even higher: Aston (12.1 per cent), Sparkbrook (11), Handsworth (10.5), Washwood Heath (10.2). Comparable areas can be found across the country.
In other words, James Turner Street is just one of many where the ‘something for nothing culture’ — to use Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith’s words — has transformed the fundamental character of a once-respectable neighbourhood. Take the house where Mark Thomas and Becky Howe live. The couple, both 23, have two children and were picking up £1,500 a month in benefits from this address at one point. By their own admission, all their payments stopped after they were caught fiddling claims — but they still see themselves as victims. 
‘They [the producers] just tried to make us look like slums — everyone on the street is fuming about it,’ Miss Howe told the Birmingham Mail. ‘Half of my family and friends have already disowned me because of it. Some want me to change my name by deed poll.’
Romanian immigrants - including a child bride and one English speaker - who clash with other residents
Romanian immigrants - including a child bride and one English speaker - who clash with other residents
Controversial: The series has been attacked for its portrayal of claimants
Controversial: The series has been attacked for its portrayal of claimants
Yet isn’t there a telling contrast when you see who once lived here? 
The 1911 census tells us that Mark and Becky’s house was once home to Edwin Toole, 69, and his wife Elizabeth, 59. Edwin was a blacksmith and Elizabeth a shop manager. Their daughter Sophie, 21, was a sewing machinist and her sister, 19, worked in a warehouse. 
Hard work, not fraudulent benefit claims, paid the family’s bills.
Or take the case of 32-year-old Dee Roberts, aka ‘Black Dee’, who has not worked for six years. 
Back when the street was first built, her house was occupied by Frederick Hodges, 48, his wife Laura, 47, Mabel, 18, and Howard, 16. 
Every member of the family was in employment — Frederick as a house painter, Laura as a nurse, Mabel as a typesetter and Howard as a sewing machine mechanic.
Today, a few doors along the road, we find Deirdre Kelly, 42. Viewers were told that ‘White Dee’ was struggling to bring up two children on benefits, and there was no sign of a partner. Yet her Facebook page, until a few days ago at least, was full of photos of family holidays and pop concerts.
‘I will always look out for my friends because that is the sort of person I am,’ declared the woman who boasts of being the ‘mother of the street’ but who once stole £13,000 from the vulnerable to fund her lover’s crack habit.
In 1911, Deirdre Kelly’s residence was home to Ellen Ashforth, 41, who was a full-time mum to five children, four aged under ten. Her husband Jesse, 38, and one son, 20, were both silversmith polishers.
The traditional values espoused by working-class families like the Ashforths, Hodges and Tooles, and passed down from father to son, mother to daughter, continued down the generations until George Drummond arrived on James Turner Street in the Sixties. 
Proof decent people still live there: Long-suffering resident George Drummond
Proof decent people still live there: Long-suffering resident George Drummond
By then he was married and employed on the buses. His three children attended the school at the top of the road. Many of their neighbours worked at firms such as General Electrics and IMI.
‘We all left in the morning and came back in the evening,’ he recalled in the lounge of his three-bedroom terrace, which is covered in family photos.
‘You knew everybody. Many  owned their own homes and people took pride in them. In summer, everyone would be out the back. Maybe you might have a beer, but there was never any trouble.’
Over the years, like most industrial cities, Birmingham slid into economic decline and ‘working class’ was replaced by ‘underclass.’
The most dramatic change in James Turner Street occurred around seven years ago, coinciding with the closure of General Electrics, which provided thousands of local jobs. Owner-occupiers began to move out, and people in temporary housing began to move in. 
It was around this time that Deidre Kelly surfaced in the road.
Mr Drummond stresses that he has nothing against any of the residents on his street but adds: ‘You don’t know now who your neighbours are. You’re not able to get to know them. They might be there one day and then they’re gone. The nextdoor house has been empty for a month, and so has the one with all the rubbish out the front.’
The school at the end of the street where Mr Drummond’s children went, and where pupils now speak 20 different languages, was placed in ‘special measures’ by Ofsted in July. Inspectors found attendance and standards of reading, writing and maths to be ‘below average’.
Back on the street, we finally caught up with ‘Black Dee’, in a manner of speaking. She ‘spoke’ to us through the letter box of ‘White Dee’s’ house: ‘You lot have been harassing me and I don’t want to talk to you. If you print anything that is wrong, I will sue for libel.’
No doubt, we will be seeing more of the two Dees in future episodes of Benefits Street. Apparently, we will also be introduced to a family of Romanian immigrants — including a child bride and one solitary English speaker — who clash with other residents.
‘I cried when I saw the documentary,’ admitted one elderly women, who has lived on the street for 40 years. ‘It broke my heart. It used to be a beautiful street. It was full of families and hard-working people. It was a lovely community.’
But isn’t the story of James Turner Road also the story of the way so much of Britain is now going?


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2537414/Think-Benefits-Street-makes-shocking-TV-Try-living-A-worrying-dispatch-respectable-street-thats-making-headlines-week.html#ixzz2q4bk8uLy
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Today's post

Jesus Christ, The Same Yesterday, Today and Forever

I had the privilege to be raised in a Christian Home and had the input of my parents and grandparents into my life, they were ...