Saturday, 25 January 2014

Two faces of Benefits Street: No drugs, no drunks, no crime - and no foul language! Now our hard-working community's turned into a moral cesspit, say families raised there in a prouder age


  • Photographs taken of residents of James Turner Street in post-war Britain
  • Location is now featured in Channel 4's Benefits Street
  • Residents, almost all of whom are on benefits, shown living in squalor
  • Locals say area was starkly different after the war - with a strong community spirit and work ethic

A little girl in a white silk dress poses shyly with a basket of flowers, in a garden bordered by a neat privet hedge. The roofs of terraced houses can be seen beyond. She is about to attend a church parade.
A small boy, of perhaps the same age, stands to attention in a double-breasted coat and school cap outside the bay window of his redbrick home. His shoes and shirt are immaculate and only an errant right sock, which has begun to wrinkle and slide down his leg, suggests anything less than a dedication to military smartness - by his parents, at least.
Both photographs were taken in the same street, in the same period of immediate post-war Britain. No litter. No television aerials. Both evoke an urban working-class pride in family, home and hard work, as well as a sense of community and making the best of a tough situation.
Nina Clayton aged 6 all dressed up for the church procession
Looking smart: Martin Hanchett (left) stands in his school uniform on the street and Nina Clayton, aged 6, all dressed up for the church procession
The girl’s dress is made from parachute silk; a luxury commodity only made available by a parent’s involvement in the recently ended world war.
In that respect the photographs are wholly unremarkable. Thousands like them must exist. And yet they are not mundane. In their modest good order they are both shocking and sad, because the street in which they were taken is today the most notorious in Britain; made so by a television programme which has shown the current residents’ lifestyles, squalor, habitual criminality and an overall social disintegration.
 
James Turner Street in Winson Green, Birmingham, is infamous after being featured in Channel 4’s highly controversial series Benefits Street.
Today the majority of residents in the Victorian terrace houses claim benefits. The road is filthy, with rubbish strewn across the street and dirty mattresses abandoned on the pavements.
Many of those featured are criminals, drunks or class-A drug addicts. Neighbours rob each other and children fend for themselves while their parents smoke and drink outside.
Nina Clayton, aged 6, pictured middle, with her family all dressed up for the church procession
Nina Clayton, aged 6, pictured middle, with her family all dressed up for the church procession
But it was not always this way. This week, we spoke to members of families who lived in the ‘golden age’ of ‘Benefits Street’ in the Forties through to the Seventies. They have long since moved away and now say they are saddened by how far their former home has fallen and the ‘scrounging vermin’ who live there now.
Martin Hanchett was the small chap in the cap and wrinkled sock. His family lived two doors away from the house now inhabited by the mother known as White Dee.
His great-grandparents, grandparents and his mother Helen all lived on the road, the family having settled there at the start of the 20th century.
Mr Hanchett, 65, said the family all worked in manual jobs, some from as young as ten years old, and moved to the area from Nottingham because Birmingham was renowned as the ‘city of 1,000 trades’.
The women would work in cafes or wash neighbours’ clothes for change, he recalled.
‘Everybody was working,’ he said. ‘People had to because there was no welfare. Attitudes are different now. There’s a lot of people on benefits today. My parents and grandparents wouldn’t believe it. When they were alive, if you didn’t work you didn’t get anything.’
The retired engraver, who now lives in Halesowen, West Midlands, with his wife said he was dismayed at the state of the street and how moral standards have disappeared.
‘Nobody ever swore like that when we were there. If you were caught swearing in the street and a passer-by heard you, he’d give you a clip round the ear. That’s how it was.
‘The way they now swear at the young kids is dreadful.
‘I can’t remember as a kid any robberies or thefts. I never knew anyone who was a drunk. There wasn’t anyone taking drugs. There was never rubbish on the road like there is now.
‘You kept your doors open. It used to be a nice road, with privet bushes outside every house. People had pride in their appearance.
‘It was a community — a village within a city, really.
Changes: The street is now featured in Channel 4 documentary Benefits Street
Changes: The street is now featured in Channel 4 documentary Benefits Street
‘A lot of people I know can’t bring themselves to watch the programme. We’re shocked at what has happened to the street.’
Nina Clayton was six when her photograph was taken as she wore the parachute silk dress, made by her mother.
In the Forties she lived with her parents and two brothers a few houses away from where White Dee now lives.
‘Our house was a small grocer’s shop,’ she said. ‘I was only five or six at the time but I remember it so well, cigarettes kept under the counter for regulars, sacks of liquorice root, the fish and chip shop around the corner where you could get free scratchings.’
John Cahill, 56, lived on the street in the Sixties and Seventies before leaving to join the forces. He is now a bricklayer and lives in Wolverhampton with his wife, with whom he has three adult children.
He said: ‘It infuriates me that these people are wallowing in their mire. They enjoy the lifestyle they are leading. It just dismays me to see what sort of vermin have colonised the area. They have turned it into a cesspit.
‘It is such a shame because of all the happy memories I had growing up there. I am ashamed to tell anyone I spent my childhood there because people will think I am as bad as the people in the programme. But my parents and their neighbours were a world apart.
Two residents sit drinking beer on their doorstep while talking to a child on a bicycle
Two residents sit drinking beer on their doorstep while talking to a child on a bicycle
Piles of rubbish are often seen scattered all over the street - which was very different in the post-war era
Piles of rubbish are often seen scattered all over the street - which was very different in the post-war era
‘My parents would be disgusted if they saw what it was like now.’
Mr Cahill was brought up with his three siblings on James Turner Street by his father Joseph, a lathe turner, and mother Edna, who worked in a factory.
He said all the residents worked, even most mothers, and they took pride in their children’s discipline and appearance.  
‘My dad worked all the time. My mum was also at work. They couldn’t afford not to.
‘You never swore in front of your parents because you knew what you were going to get if you answered back. Now the children are effing and blinding, and that’s even the toddlers.
‘I can’t believe how bad it has got. It is filthy now. There is this greed — people want something for nothing.’
The road is believed to be named after James Turner, a 19th-century master at the local King Edward’s School, who never missed a day  of work.
‘He went out, worked hard and earned that honour,’ says Mr Cahill. ‘Now his name is associated with everything he was not.’



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2545563/Two-faces-Benefits-Street-No-drugs-no-drunks-no-crime-no-foul-language-Now-hard-working-communitys-turned-moral-cesspit-say-families-raised-prouder-age.html#ixzz2rNigEOup
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Do Dogs Go to Heaven or Just Seeker-Friendly Churches?

Do Dogs Go to Heaven or Just Seeker-Friendly Churches?



Dogs

Business is alive and kicking in our Northern cities

Business is alive and kicking in our Northern cities



REGENERATION In Manchester small companies are recruiting new staff

Monday, 20 January 2014

Housing benefit ban on jobless migrants: Ministers' new crackdown to stop Britain's welfare system being magnet to citizens of other EU states, Daily Mail


  • New rules mean EU arrivals claiming jobseeker's allowance will not be able to receive housing benefit as well
  • Those who get jobs but then lose them will only be entitled to housing benefit for six months 
  • Ministers hope the measures will cut migration to the UK from EU states 
  • But both Iain Duncan Smith and Theresa May say more needs to be done 
Jobless immigrants are to be denied housing benefit.
Writing in the Mail today, Iain Duncan Smith and Theresa May say Britain’s generous welfare system should no longer be a magnet for citizens of other EU states.
The Work and Pensions Secretary and the Home Secretary claim Labour doled out millions of pounds ‘for people to sit on benefits’ while opening the door to mass migration.
They pointed to incendiary figures showing the number of Britons in jobs plunged by 413,000 between 2005 and 2010, while the number of working foreigners soared by 736,000.

Less appealing: Ministers have outlined a tough new crackdown on migrants claiming benefits in a bid to get annual net migration down to the tens of thousands
Less appealing: Ministers have outlined a tough new crackdown on migrants claiming benefits in a bid to get annual net migration down to the tens of thousands
Home secretary Theresa May
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Iain Duncan Smith
New rules: Home secretary Theresa May, pictured left, and Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Iain Duncan Smith, pictured right, claim the Government's reforms to welfare and immigration systems are beginning to pay off 
They said this was a shameful betrayal and evidence that immigration can displace some British workers and depress wages for the low-skilled.
 


    Under the new rules, to be introduced in April, new European arrivals claiming jobseeker’s allowance will not be able to receive housing benefit as well.
    Those who get jobs but then go on to out-of-work handouts will be able to claim housing benefit for up to six months.
    After this they will have to show they have a genuine prospect of work.
    Housing benefit helps cover accommodation costs for people who are out of work or on low incomes.
    Strict: Under the new regulations, EU arrivals claiming jobseeker's allowance will not be able to claim housing benefit as well
    Strict: Under the new regulations, EU arrivals claiming jobseeker's allowance will not be able to claim housing benefit as well
    Under emergency regulations that took effect on January 1, all new EU migrants now have to wait for at least three months before they can claim out-of-work benefits.
    In their article, Mr Duncan Smith and Mrs May say the Government’s reforms to the welfare and immigration systems are beginning to pay off.
    Between 2010 and 2013, the number of Britons in jobs rose by 538,000, while the number of working foreigners increased by 247,000.
    The figures are even more striking for the year 2012-13 with 348,000 more British workers and only 26,000 from abroad.
    Employment minister Esther McVey has claimed the Government's long-term economic plan has helped create 1.6million private sector jobs
    Employment minister Esther McVey has claimed the Government's long-term economic plan has helped create 1.6million private sector jobs
    The ministers say the new £26,000-a-year cap on household benefit claims has affected 33,000 families and encouraged up to 19,000 to return to work.
    A limit on economic migrants from outside the EU, changes to the rules on family and student visas and a crackdown on bogus colleges have helped bring down net migration by nearly a third from its peak.
    However, Mr Duncan Smith and Mrs May admit there is ‘much more to do’ to meet a Tory target of getting annual net migration down to the tens of thousands. 
    Ministers have set out a series of measures to limit migrant access to public services and benefits to try to reduce further so-called ‘pull factors’ to the UK.
    Landlords will be fined up to £3,000 if they rent a property to an illegal immigrant, while non-EU migrants will be expected to pay a levy of £200 a year to access the NHS if they do not have private healthcare. 
    The changes to the housing benefit rules will not affect UK and Irish Republic nationals, or European migrants genuinely self-employed or in a job. 
    European nationals who have been working in the UK, and are subsequently made redundant and claim benefits, will not be affected.
    Historically, EU migrants have been able to lodge a claim for the benefit as soon as they arrive in Britain and pass a ‘habitual residence test’ under EU rules.
    The Government’s reforms mean they will not be able to make a housing benefit claim at any point unless they are in work.
    Employment minister Esther McVey said the Government’s long-term economic plan had helped create 1.6million private sector jobs.

    This shameful betrayal

    It was a shameful betrayal of thousands of British workers. For years Labour presided over a labour market where the number of foreign people in jobs rocketed to record levels – while thousands of British workers were left on the sidelines, facing the prospect of long-term unemployment.
    Today – as Work and Pensions Secretary and Home Secretary – we publish a devastating analysis which lays bare the shocking scale of Labour’s failure.
    But this analysis also demonstrates how this Government’s long-term economic plan is putting things right.
    Welfare reform and controlling immigration are at the very core of this plan – and if we are to strike the right balance for a strong, sustainable economy, we cannot look at these issues in isolation.
    Both Home Secretary Theresa May, pictured with Prime Minister David Cameron, and Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith claim Labour doled out millions in benefits while allowing mass migration
    Both Home Secretary Theresa May, pictured with Prime Minister David Cameron, and Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith claim Labour doled out millions in benefits while allowing mass migration
    Labour failed to recognise that if you have a welfare system that doesn’t make work worthwhile or support people into jobs, you pay the price elsewhere.
    With one hand, Labour doled out millions of pounds for people to sit on benefits. With the other, they opened the door to mass migration, with those from abroad filling jobs which our own people didn’t want or couldn’t get. 
    In just five years between 2005 and 2010, for every British person who fell out of work, almost two foreign nationals gained employment. 
    Now, the Home Office and Department for Work and Pensions are working together to put this travesty right. 
    Already, we are seeing success in reforming welfare and restoring the incentive for British people to get back to work. 
    Iain Duncan Smith argues that the Government is now reversing the damage done under Labour
    Iain Duncan Smith argues that the Government is now reversing the damage done under Labour
    Take the benefit cap: already 33,000 households have had their benefits cut so they receive no more than average earnings, and 19,000 potentially capped claimants have returned to work.
    As a result, as our economy picks up, we have reversed the damaging trend under Labour. The latest data shows that of the rise in employment over the past year, over 90 per cent went to UK nationals.
    We’re also putting right the mess Labour left on immigration. Of course immigration, over the generations, has made a tremendously rich contribution to our country, both culturally and in terms of the talent it brings – but it must be controlled.
    We know that the idea there’s a set number of jobs to be divided up and handed around is wrong, and things are far more complicated than the simplistic notion that all immigrants come and ‘take British jobs’. 
    But evidence from the Migration Advisory Committee and other academic studies has demonstrated that immigration can displace some British workers in the labour market. So we have tightened up the system... and the latest figures show our reforms are working.
    For those migrants who do come here, we’re ensuring they are unable to take unfair advantage of our system by accessing benefits as soon as they arrive.
    For example, we introduced rules so that from January 1 this year we are banning individuals from receiving out-of-work benefits until they have been living in the UK for three months. And we will go still further: from the beginning of April we will be removing entitlement to housing benefit altogether for this group. 
    In addition, EU migrants can only claim jobseeker’s allowance for six months unless they have genuine prospects of finding work. No longer can people come here from abroad and expect to get something for nothing.
    Together, these new immigration and benefit checks will clamp down on those trying to exploit the system. We can ensure that Britain’s growing economy and dynamic jobs market deliver for those who work hard and play by the rules.


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2542352/Exclusive-Ministers-new-crackdown-Housing-benefit-ban-jobless-migrants.html#ixzz2qurATAEH
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

    Lions and donkeys: 10 big myths about World War One debunked, Dan Show BBC News



    Generals on horseback


    Much of what we think we know about the 1914-18 conflict is wrong, writes historian Dan Snow.
    No war in history attracts more controversy and myth than World War One.
    For the soldiers who fought it was in some ways better than previous conflicts, and in some ways worse.
    By setting it apart as uniquely awful we are blinding ourselves to the reality of not just WW1 but war in general. We are also in danger of belittling the experience of soldiers and civilians caught up in countless other appalling conflicts throughout history and the present day.
    It was the bloodiest war in history to that point
    Stretcher bearers, 1918
    Fifty years before WW1 broke out, southern China was torn apart by an even bloodier conflict. Conservative estimates of the dead in the 14-year Taiping rebellion start at between 20 and 30 million. Around 17 million soldiers and civilians were killed during WW1.
    Although more Britons died in WW1 than any other conflict, the bloodiest war in our history relative to population size is the Civil War which raged in the mid-17th Century. It saw a far higher proportion of the population of the British Isles killed than the less than 2% who died in WW1. By contrast around 4% of the population of England and Wales, and considerably more than that in Scotland and Ireland, are thought to have been killed in the Civil War.
    Most soldiers died
    In the UK around six million men were mobilised, and of those just over 700,000 were killed. That's around 11.5%.
    In fact, as a British soldier you were more likely to die during the Crimean War (1853-1856) than in WW1.

    Trenches in WW1

    Dan Snow
    Men lived in the trenches for years on end
    Frontline trenches could be a terribly hostile place to live. Often wet, cold and exposed to the enemy, units would quickly lose their morale if they spent too much time in them.
    As a result, the British army rotated men in and out continuously. Between battles, a unit spent perhaps 10 days a month in the trench system, and of those, rarely more than three days right up on the frontline. It was not unusual to be out of the line for a month.
    World war one trench
    During moments of crisis, such as big offensives, the British could occasionally spend up to seven days on the frontline but were far more often rotated out after just a day or two.
    The upper class got off lightly
    Although the great majority of casualties in WW1 were from the working class, the social and political elite was hit disproportionately hard by WW1. Their sons provided the junior officers whose job it was to lead the way over the top and expose themselves to the greatest danger as an example to their men.
    Some 12% of the British army's ordinary soldiers were killed during the war, compared with 17% of its officers. Eton alone lost more than 1,000 former pupils - 20% of those who served. UK wartime Prime Minister Herbert Asquith lost a son, while future Prime Minister Bonar Law lost two. Anthony Eden lost two brothers, another brother of his was terribly wounded and an uncle was captured.
    'Lions led by donkeys'
    George V and his generals, Buckingham Palace 1918George V and his generals, Buckingham Palace 1918

    Start Quote

    British commanders were thrust into a massive industrial struggle unlike anything the Army had ever seen”
    This saying was supposed to have come from senior German commanders describing brave British soldiers led by incompetent old toffs from their chateaux. In fact it was made up by historian Alan Clark.
    During the war more than 200 generals were killed, wounded or captured. Most visited the frontlines every day. In battle they were considerably closer to the action than generals are today.
    Naturally, some generals were not up to the job, but others were brilliant, such as Arthur Currie, a middle-class Canadian failed insurance broker and property developer.
    Rarely in history have commanders had to adapt to a more radically different technological environment.
    British commanders had been trained to fight small colonial wars, now they were thrust into a massive industrial struggle unlike anything the British army had ever seen.
    Despite this, within three years the British had effectively invented a method of warfare still recognisable today. By the summer of 1918 the British army was probably at its best ever and it inflicted crushing defeats on the Germans.
    Gallipoli was fought by Australians and New Zealanders
    Anzac day marked at Gallipoli, 2011Australians and New Zealanders mark Anzac Day in Gallipoli, 2011
    Far more British soldiers fought on the Gallipoli peninsula than Australians and New Zealanders put together.
    The UK lost four or five times as many men in the brutal campaign as her imperial Anzac contingents. The French also lost more men than the Australians.
    The Aussies and Kiwis commemorate Gallipoli ardently, and understandably so, as their casualties do represent terrible losses both as a proportion of their forces committed and of their small populations.
    Tactics on the Western Front remained unchanged despite repeated failure
    Never have tactics and technology changed so radically in four years of fighting. It was a time of extraordinary innovation. In 1914 generals on horseback galloped across battlefields as men in cloth caps charged the enemy without the necessary covering fire. Both sides were overwhelmingly armed with rifles. Four years later, steel-helmeted combat teams dashed forward protected by a curtain of artillery shells.
    They were now armed with flame throwers, portable machine guns and grenades fired from rifles. Above, planes, that in 1914 would have appeared unimaginably sophisticated duelled in the skies, some carrying experimental wireless radio sets, reporting real-time reconnaissance.
    Huge artillery pieces fired with pinpoint accuracy - using only aerial photos and maths they could score a hit on the first shot. Tanks had gone from the drawing board to the battlefield in just two years, also changing war forever.

    The World War One Centenary

    British soldier in France, August 1914, preparing to go to the front line
    No one won
    Swathes of Europe lay wasted, millions were dead or wounded. Survivors lived on with severe mental trauma. The UK was broke. It is odd to talk about winning.
    However, in a narrow military sense, the UK and her allies convincingly won. Germany's battleships had been bottled up by the Royal Navy until their crews mutinied rather than make a suicidal attack against the British fleet.


      Germany's Army collapsed as a series of mighty allied blows scythed through supposedly impregnable defences.
      By late September 1918 the German emperor and his military mastermind Erich Ludendorff admitted that there was no hope and Germany must beg for peace. The 11 November Armistice was essentially a German surrender.
      Unlike Hitler in 1945, the German government did not insist on a hopeless, pointless struggle until the allies were in Berlin - a decision that saved countless lives, but was seized upon later to claim Germany never really lost.
      The Versailles Treaty was extremely harsh
      The treaty of Versailles confiscated 10% of Germany's territory but left it the largest, richest nation in central Europe.
      It was largely unoccupied and financial reparations were linked to its ability to pay, which mostly went unenforced anyway.
      The treaty was notably less harsh than treaties that ended the 1870-1 Franco-Prussian War and World War Two. The German victors in the former annexed large chunks of two rich French provinces, part of France for around 300 years, and home to most of French iron ore production, as well as presenting France with a massive bill for immediate payment.
      Treaty of VersaillesTreaty of Versailles, 1919
      After WW2 Germany was occupied, split up, her factory machinery smashed or stolen and millions of prisoners forced to stay with their captors and work as slave labourers. Germany lost all the territory it had lost after WW1 and another giant slice on top of that.
      Versailles was not harsh but was portrayed as such by Hitler who sought to create a tidal wave of anti-Versailles sentiment on which he could then ride into power.
      Everyone hated it
      Like any war, it all comes down to luck. You may witness unimaginable horrors that leave you mentally and physically incapacitated for life, or you might get away without a scrape. It could be the best of times, or the worst of times.
      Many soldiers enjoyed WW1. If they were lucky they would avoid a big offensive, and much of the time, conditions might be better than at home.
      German soldiers and Polish girls
      For the British there was meat every day - a rare luxury back home - cigarettes, tea and rum, part of a daily diet of over 4,000 calories.
      Absentee rates due to sickness, an important barometer of a unit's morale were, remarkably, hardly above peacetime rates. Many young men enjoyed the guaranteed pay, the intense comradeship, the responsibility and a much greater sexual freedom than in peacetime Britain.
      Follow @BBCNewsMagazine on Twitter and on Facebook

      Sunday, 19 January 2014

      Words for the Wise, Matthew 8 Faith to Heal








      Matthew 8

      New American Standard Bible (NASB)

      Jesus Cleanses a Leper; The Centurion’s Faith

      8 When [a]Jesus came down from the mountain, [b]large crowds followed Him. 2 And a leper came to Him and [c]bowed down before Him, and said, “Lord, if You are willing, You can make me clean.” 3 Jesus stretched out His hand and touched him, saying, “I am willing; be cleansed.” And immediately his leprosy was cleansed. 4 And Jesus *said to him, “See that you tell no one; but go, show yourself to the priest and present the [d]offering that Moses commanded, as a testimony to them.”

      5 And when [e]Jesus entered Capernaum, a centurion came to Him, imploring Him, 6 and saying, “[f]Lord, my [g]servant is [h]lying paralyzed at home, fearfully tormented.” 7 Jesus *said to him, “I will come and heal him.” 8 But the centurion said, “[i]Lord, I am not worthy for You to come under my roof, but just [j]say the word, and my [k]servant will be healed. 9 For I also am a man under authority, with soldiers under me; and I say to this one, ‘Go!’ and he goes, and to another, ‘Come!’ and he comes, and to my slave, ‘Do this!’ and he does it.” 10 Now when Jesus heard this, He marveled and said to those who were following, “Truly I say to you, I have not found such great faith [l]with anyone in Israel. 11 I say to you that many will come from east and west, and [m]recline at the table with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven; 12 but the sons of the kingdom will be cast out into the outer darkness; in that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.” 13 And Jesus said to the centurion, “Go; [n]it shall be done for you as you have believed.” And the [o]servant was healed that very [p]moment.

      Peter’s Mother-in-law and Many Others Healed

      14 When Jesus came into Peter’s [q]home, He saw his mother-in-law lying sick in bed with a fever. 15 He touched her hand, and the fever left her; and she got up and [r]waited on Him. 16 When evening came, they brought to Him many who were demon-possessed; and He cast out the spirits with a word, and healed all who were ill. 17 This was to fulfill what was spoken through Isaiah the prophet: “He Himself took our infirmities and [s]carried away our diseases.”

      Discipleship Tested

      18 Now when Jesus saw a crowd around Him, He gave orders to depart to the other side of the sea. 19 Then a scribe came and said to Him, “Teacher, I will follow You wherever You go.” 20 Jesus *said to him, “The foxes have holes and the birds of the [t]air have [u]nests, but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay His head.” 21 Another of the disciples said to Him, “Lord, permit me first to go and bury my father.” 22 But Jesus *said to him, “Follow Me, and allow the dead to bury their own dead.”

      23 When He got into the boat, His disciples followed Him. 24 And behold, there arose [v]a great storm on the sea, so that the boat was being covered with the waves; but Jesus Himself was asleep. 25 And they came to Him and woke Him, saying, “Save us, Lord; we are perishing!” 26 He *said to them, “Why are you [w]afraid, you men of little faith?” Then He got up and rebuked the winds and the sea, and [x]it became perfectly calm. 27 The men were amazed, and said, “What kind of a man is this, that even the winds and the sea obey Him?”

      Jesus Casts Out Demons

      28 When He came to the other side into the country of the Gadarenes, two men who were demon-possessed met Him as they were coming out of the tombs. They were so extremely violent that no one could pass by that way. 29 And they cried out, saying, “[y]What business do we have with each other, Son of God? Have You come here to torment us before [z]the time?” 30 Now there was a herd of many swine feeding at a distance from them. 31 The demons began to entreat Him, saying, “If You are going to cast us out, send us into the herd of swine.” 32 And He said to them, “Go!” And they came out and went into the swine, and the whole herd rushed down the steep bank into the sea and perished in the waters. 33 The herdsmen ran away, and went to the city and reported everything, [aa]including what had happened to the demoniacs. 34 And behold, the whole city came out to meet Jesus; and when they saw Him, they implored Him to leave their region.

      Bible Panorama

      Matthew 8

      V 1–17: COMPREHENSIVENESS Jesus heals the unclean leper (verses 1 to 4), the centurion’s servant (verses 5 to 13), Peter’s mother-in-law (verses 14 and 15) and demon-possessed and sick people (verses 16 and 17). He meets the needs of many different types of people, irrespective of their background, social standing, gender, or age.

       V 18–22: COST Jesus’ responses to a scribe and then to a disciple reveal that following Him must come before where we prefer to live and what our family wants us to do. (There is no suggestion that the disciple’s father is actually dying at the time when his son wants to delay following Christ until after his burial.)

       V 23–34: CALM The Lord Jesus Christ stills the storm, showing His power over nature, and casts out demons from demon-possessed people, showing His power over Satan. He can deal with the storms and domination of Satan in men and women. That is why the whole city comes out to meet Him. But, sadly, they want Him to leave.

      The Bible Panorama. Copyright © 2005 Day One Publications.






      Yours by His Grace

      Blair Humphreys

      Southport,  Merseyside

      January 19th 2014


      Why pro-independence Catalans envy Scotland, By Allan Little BBC News

      Why pro-independence Catalans envy Scotland

      Catalonia flag and roadsignSant Pere de Torello sees itself as a pioneer in the drive for Catalan self-rule

      Related Stories

      The hilltop village of Sant Pere de Torello, in the foothills of the Pyrenees, north of Barcelona, is decked in the colours of Catalan statehood.
      The red-blue-gold flag of the movement to win independence from Spain flies from windows, balconies and rooftops in every street.
      The flag also rises above the town hall of this community of 2,500, whose mayor was the first local official in Catalonia to declare his area a free Catalan territory - electing to send local taxes to the Catalan capital Barcelona, instead of directly to Madrid. It is a symbolic repudiation of the town's Spanish heritage in favour of an explicit Catalan national identity.
      "It is a small thing," says Griselda Castells, an adviser to the mayor, "but we have tried for years to explain to Spain that we need action - but nothing changes.
      "Now the government of Spain can see that it is real, this feeling that we have. It's a small thing but an important thing for our ideology, for our dream, that Catalonia will be independent."
      There has been a dramatic rise in support for Catalan independence in the last few years. A pro-independence demonstration in Barcelona in September 2012 attracted more than a million people. Opinion polls frequently put support for a break with Spain at more than 50%.
      Scottish independence
      President Artur Mas: 'Catalonia and Scotland have enough personality to follow their own ways.'
      The president of Catalonia's regional government, the pro-independence Artur Mas, has majority support in parliament for a referendum which, he says, will take place in November. Spain, though, has said the move is illegal and that the referendum will not go ahead.
      The stand-off is in marked contrast to the situation in Scotland, with which Catalonia is frequently compared. There, the pro-independence Scottish National Party won a majority in the Scottish parliament and announced plans for a referendum to take place in September. It reached an agreement with the British government on the timing of the poll, and on the wording of the question: "should Scotland be an independent country?"
      The UK government, and the anti-independence "Better Together" campaign, have both said they will respect the outcome of the referendum.
      "We envy a little bit what is happening in the UK," Artur Mas told me, "because what we would like is an agreement with the Spanish institutions.
      "Our aim is to reach this agreement, but the difference is that in Spain the central government says you don't have the right to vote."

      Start Quote

      You cannot stop a democratic and peaceful movement like this”
      Artur MasCatalan president
      So, I asked him, would you rather be dealing with UK Prime Minister David Cameron than with the current Spanish government?
      "Of course," he said. "Well, not exactly with David Cameron but with the British mentality. That is to say: if you have a nation, Scotland or Catalonia, and you have in this nation a broad majority of the population that is asking for a referendum, real democracy, what should you do? You should sit at the table, reach an agreement and let the people vote. This is the British way. And I wish that Spain was exactly the same, with the same mentality."
      But Spain is not the United Kingdom and Catalonia is not Scotland. Scotland and Catalonia have similar sized populations - five million and 7.5 million, respectively.
      Scotland contributes just over 8% of the UK's taxes (excluding oil and gas) - about the same proportion as the size of its population.
      But Catalonia is Spain's wealthiest and most economically productive region and accounts for about a quarter of Spain's taxes - far more than its share of Spain's population. This disparity has helped fuel the rise in support for independence.
      Barcelona pro-independence rally, 11 Sep 12In September 2012 pro-independence Catalans thronged the streets of Barcelona
      Madrid warning
      There is a further key difference between Scotland and Catalonia. In Scotland, the SNP has campaigned for independence as a matter of principle since the party was founded nearly a century ago. Support for independence has been fairly solid at more than 30%, arguably for decades.
      In Catalonia, support has rocketed from somewhere in the teens to more than 50% since the current economic crisis began, leading many anti-independence campaigners to argue that this recent rise is ephemeral, an anomaly - a short-term response to a short-term economic crisis, but one which could have irreversible long-term consequences.

      Start Quote

      We hope it won't come to this, but we could for instance suspend Catalonia's autonomy”
      Fernando Sanchez CostaCatalan MP in Spain's Popular Party
      And although a clear majority in Catalonia - about three-quarters of the people in recent opinion polls - want the right to vote on the matter, a minority want Spain to act to stop the referendum taking place at all.
      "Spain could do many things," says Fernando Sanchez Costa, a member of the Catalan parliament for the governing centre-right Spanish party, the Popular Party.
      "We hope it won't come to this, but we could for instance suspend Catalonia's autonomy. Our democratic constitution gives us the tools. It wouldn't be necessary to suspend [the Catalan] parliament. In Northern Ireland something similar happened a few years ago. Some competences were taken away temporarily. This could happen in Catalonia."
      Many in Catalonia believe that would only boost support for independence still further.
      Artur Mas says he is determined to go ahead regardless. "Let me remind you," he says, "that we had democratic elections here a year ago. The electoral pledges were very clear and the people elected us because they wanted the right to exercise this choice. We must stick by our promise to hold a consultation".
      And if Spain blocks it? "Then we will call new elections, by 2016 at the latest, and this election will become the referendum on independence. You cannot convince the Catalan people that they have no right to vote on this. You cannot stop a democratic and peaceful movement like this."

      More on This Story

      Today's post

      Jesus Christ, The Same Yesterday, Today and Forever

      I had the privilege to be raised in a Christian Home and had the input of my parents and grandparents into my life, they were ...