Leading Scottish business figure calls for currency Plan B | Better Together

Leading Scottish business figure calls for currency Plan B | Better Together

One of Scotland’s most respected business figures has said that Alex Salmond must come clean with a Plan B on currency.

Jack Perry is the former Chief Executive of Scottish Enterprise, the agency responsible for supporting Scotland’s firms to compete at home and around the world.

He knows what he is talking about when it comes to creating jobs for Scotland. That’s why his intervention in the referendum debate is so significant.

Jack Perry has said that if Alex Salmond follows through on his hints, nods and winks to use the pound without a formal currency union in a separate Scotland, there would have to be big spending cuts on vital public services like our NHS and schools.

This is over and above the £6 billion in either tax rises or spending cuts that the impartial experts Institute for Fiscal Studies have said a separate Scotland would face in the years after separation, in addition to those taking place today.

That is half of our entire NHS budget. We can’t afford to put that at risk.

The currency we use is fundamental to everything that we do as a country.

How can we have any confidence about the future if we don’t know what money we would get our wages, pensions and benefits in?

The future of our schools and hospitals would be at risk if we don’t know what currency we would use to pay for them in an independent Scotland.

And how can families plan for the future when we don’t know what currency we would use to pay for energy and shopping bills if we leave the UK?

Train fares ‘will increase 25% in next four years’ unless funding rules are torn up: Labour call for cap on price rises and simplified ticket structure Daily Mail

  Rail fares are on course to soar by about a quarter over the next four years

  Will rise by up to 5.6% next year - total increase of 24% since last election

  Labour calling for reform of 'broken market' including capping of fare rises 

  Shadow Transport Secretary: 'Our rail fares are among highest in Europe'

Rail fares are on course to soar by a quarter over the next four years unless funding rules are torn up, Labour will warn today.

Official figures released this morning are expected to show that rail fares will rise by up to 5.6 per cent next year.

The Campaign for Better Transport (CBT) said this would take the total increase to 24.7 per cent since the last election.

And Shadow Transport Secretary Mary Creagh will warn that fares will rise by a further 24 per cent by 2018 unless existing rules are changed.

Although annual rail fare increases are implemented in January they are based on Retail Price Index figures from the previous July. Under current rules, regulated train fares will rise by RPI plus 1 per cent.

Read the full article here:

RICHARD LITTLEJOHN: Why the world is dying to come here, Daily Mail

The discovery of 35 desperate people inside a shipping container at Tilbury docks is a real-life horror story. Basic humanity requires that we give them medical treatment and temporary accommodation.

Clearly they have suffered a terrible ordeal. They were dehydrated and close to suffocation. One of them died on the voyage from Zeebrugge.

There were 13 blameless children among those packed into what has been described as a ‘metal coffin’. We can only imagine what they have endured on their 3,500-mile journey across continents.

They have been exploited and put in mortal danger by callous traffickers, who trade in human misery.

But they weren’t kidnapped. While the children are exempt from any responsibility for their plight, all the adults involved knew what they were getting into.

They voluntarily paid the traffickers to smuggle them into Britain. Typically, it costs £20,000 to get from Afghanistan to Zeebrugge and a further £1,500 for a passage to England. I’m assuming they weren’t expecting to be flown first-class to Heathrow.

We are told they are all Afghan Sikhs fleeing Taliban persecution and they were attracted here because of the ‘thriving and established Afghan Sikh community in London’. There is also a thriving Sikh community in India, right on Afghanistan’s doorstep. So why didn’t they flee there? I’m sure they’d be more at home in the Punjab than Putney.

Why didn’t they seek asylum in Russia, or Turkey, or any of the countries that they crossed en route to Zeebrugge?

Read the full article here: