Wednesday, 6 August 2014
TODAY'S WORD FOR TODAY Prepare for Challenges ‘A sensible man watches for problems ahead and prepares to meet them.’ UCB
TODAY'S
WORD FOR TODAY
Prepare
for Challenges
‘A
sensible man watches for problems ahead and prepares to meet them.’
Proverbs
27:12
The UCB
Word for Today - 5 Aug 2014
The path
to your God-given destiny will have different challenges, so you must expect
them. Indeed you must prepare yourself to face them. Solomon wrote, ‘A sensible
man watches for problems ahead and prepares to meet them.’ Wouldn’t you rather
look ahead and prepare, instead of looking back with regret? Why does the Bible
record the failures of great men like Abraham, Moses, Elijah and Peter? To give
you hope; to let you know that nobody performs flawlessly; to help you believe
if they can do it, by God’s grace you can too. The road to success has many
potholes. You’ll fall into some—and they’re messy. Not only will you have to
climb back out, you’ll have to dust yourself off, refocus, recommit, and keep
going. Since failure is inevitable, why not make it your friend by examining
each experience and growing stronger through it? Once you learn to do that, you
won’t keep repeating the same mistakes, and you’ll become more emotionally and
spiritually stable. Timelines change, resources dry up, assumptions prove
false, plans and people fail. As comedian Bill Cosby quipped, ‘Nothing fits in
a pigeonhole but a pigeon.’ As you walk the pathway to your God-given dream,
remember the old Italian proverb: ‘Between saying and doing, many a pair of
shoes is worn out’. No problem; you can get another pair of shoes! Just make
sure you don’t wear out and give up. Here’s God’s promise to you: ‘Keep
travelling steadily along His pathway and in due season He will honour you with
every blessing’ (Psalms 37:34 TLB).
Independence referendum debate: Alistair Darling wins round one in televised clash with Alex Salmond, Daily Record, Updated
ALISTAIR
DARLING won a shock victory
in the first referendum TV debate
last night as Alex Salmond came unstuck on
the pound. The Better Together leader, an underdog before the start, hammered
the First Minister relentlessly on the future of Scotland’s currency.
And when
it was all over, 56 per cent of viewers surveyed in a snap ICM exit poll named
Darling as the winner.The former Labour Chancellor had been widely expected to
fall victim to Salmond’s feared debating skills.
But he
put his SNP rival on the
rack with strong attacks over whether Scotland would keep the pound
after a Yes
vote.The bruising encounter early in the two-hour battle seemed to unsettle the
First Minister, who went into the debate behind in the polls and knowing he
needed a convincing victory.
Salmond
rallied later to score strong points over Con-Dem welfare cuts, Trident and the
Bedroom Tax.Darling also looked uncomfortable as the First Minister repeatedly
challenged him to admit Scotland could be a “successful independent country”.
But the future of the pound – seen by many as
the key issue in the race to September 18 – was Salmond’s downfall.
Read
more here:
Further Reading here:
Yes Scotland ridiculed after issuing a guide telling supporters what to say on social media during TV debate
“The
Scottish Government’s own figures show a separate Scotland’s finances would be
in a weaker position than the UK’s 2016/17 thanks to declining North Sea oil
revenues. But the guide told supporters in bold type that “we will be in a
stronger financial position in the first years of independence than we are
today.”
Alex
Salmond accused of a 'huge deception' over his plans for a currency union after
a Yes vote
"Alex
Salmond claims that nothing much will change, that threats otherwise are a
bluff and that Scotland would keep the pound sterling - but although Scotland
could keep using the pound, to promise 'no change' is a huge deception: the
consequences would be enormous."
Duel that ignored the hard questions: MAX HASTINGS delivers his forthright verdict on last night's Scottish independence debate . Daily Mail
This was billed as the Great Debate
between Scotland’s First Minister and the former chancellor and standard-bearer
for the No campaign, Alistair Darling.
In truth it turned into the Big Silence
night, with neither side confronting the real issues and harsh realities about
the future of an independent Scotland.
Alex Salmond called on Scots to seize
the ‘opportunity’ of independence with both hands. Alistair Darling urged them
to reject it, but did not dare to say frankly to his audience: an independent
Scotland will be Iceland without the fish, a dependency culture without visible
means of support, a basket case bobbing on the remotest beach of Europe.
He had to renounce such arguments,
because Salmond mocks the No campaign as ‘Project Fear’; because polls show
that Scottish pride is affronted if anybody reminds them how meagre is their
income tax base, how feeble is entrepreneurialism north of the border, how
drugged on state subsidy their nation has become.
Salmond, one of the most skilful
politicians in Britain, handled himself brilliantly. His pronouncements, from the Vladimir Putin school of statesmanship,
are delivered with wonderful fluency, heedless of their polarisation from
truth. He emphasised again and again the
Norwegian model for an independent Scotland, saying nothing of the fact that
Norway has vastly more oil and fewer people.
He flatly contradicted Alistair
Darling’s assertion that Scotland could not expect to share a common currency
with England, saying ‘everything will change in the negotiation if we get a yes
vote’. He repeated doggedly again and
again: ‘The pound belongs to Scotland as much as to England’, which means
nothing.
Tactically, Darling was usually talking
sense and Salmond nonsense, but the ex-Chancellor – perhaps the only man to
have emerged from service in the Blair-Brown governments with an enhanced
reputation – often seemed on the wrong foot.
Nowhere in the debate, whether from the
platform, the floor or the so-called expert commentators, were hard questions asked about how Scotland would support itself as an
independent country. Salmond asserted that the respected Institute for
Fiscal Studies and Office for Budget Responsibility are simply arms of the
Westminster government, which deceive Scots by noticing that the North Sea oil take is shrinking fast. He
also rejected the IFS calculation that there is a £6billion black hole in SNP
spending plans for an independent Scotland.
He spoke as if his country was Saudi Arabia, its only problem how to
spend vast natural wealth.
Further Reading:
Tuesday, 5 August 2014
'You are really scrabbling around now!' Alistair Darling takes the fight to Alex Salmond in first live TV debate on Scottish independence Daily Mail, Updated
First Minister and ex-Chancellor take part in
live two-debate on STV
Voters to decide Scotland's fate in historic
referendum on September 18
New IpsosMORI poll puts No campaign on 54%
but Yes campaign on 40%
Up to half a million people are still
undecided with just weeks to go
No campaign has received £2.6million, ahead
of £1.5million for Yes camp
Cameron,
Clegg and Miliband sign joint declaration promising tax powers
Alex Salmond and Alistair Darling have clashed over their competing visions for the future of Scotland in the first live TV debate of the referendum campaign.
But millions of people trying to watch
the historic head-to-head were dismayed after the STV website crashed under the
intense demand from viewers worldwide.
In the early skirmishes, Mr Salmond
repeatedly complained that independence was the only way to prevent a future
Tory government while Mr Darling insisted Scotland was stronger as part of the
UK.
As the political temperature rose, Mr
Darling repeatedly accused Mr Darling of 'scrabbling around', claiming the
First Minister has 'lots of good lines but no answers'.
Voters in Scotland will make their big
decision on independence in the historic referendum on September 18.
The No campaign has been consistently ahead in the opinion polls,
despite months of intense debate, impassioned pleas and trading of facts and
figures.
One of the biggest threats to the Yes campaign has been growing doubts
about the currency an independent Scotland would use
.
After ditching the idea of adopting the euro, the SNP has claimed it
would enter a currency union with the UK and continue to use the pound.
But the Tories, Labour and Lib Dems
have all made clear they would block a deal, whoever wins the next general
election.
Mr Salmond came under intense pressure about how he would continue to
use the pound, faltering repeatedly about whether he has a back-up plan.
Further Reading:
Egypt begin work on second Suez Canal which will run alongside the original 145-year-old waterway in five years' time Daily Mail
The new 45-mile section would run alongside
the existing Suez Canal
Project could be complete in five years at a
cost of more than £2.4billion
101-mile-long Suez is the fastest shipping
link between Europe and Asia
New waterway will allow ships to travel in
both directions for half that length
Egyptian authorities believe it will boost
annual revenues to $13.5billion
Egypt is planning to build a new Suez
canal alongside the existing 145-year-old waterway in a multi-billion pound bid
to boost its economy.
The 45-mile corridor will expand what is the fastest shipping route
between Europe and Asia and is part of several 'mega projects' designed to
breathe new life into the nation.
Warplanes flew overhead in a ceremony
broadcast on state television from the canal city of Ismailia as Egypt's
president Abdel-Fatteh el-Sisi officially launched the military-led scheme, set
to cost £2.4bn.
He said that digging of the new canal
will allow ships to travel in both directions for just under half of the
canal's 101-mile length. And although the initial time frame for completion was
five years, el-Sisi estimated it could be finished in just 12 months.
Egypt is the gatekeeper of the Suez
Canal, one of the world's busiest water corridors and the strategic link
between the Red Sea and the Mediterranean.
Scotland 'likely to be worse off after independence' Daily Telegraph
Economic think tank Fiscal
Affairs Scotland draws the conclusion after analysing oil and debt figures
produced by both the UK and Scottish Governments.
Scotland is far likelier
to be worse off as a separate country, according to an impartial analysis
published today as the man who hired Fred Goodwin at RBS accused Westminster of
scaremongering over the country’s banks.
Fiscal Affairs Scotland
said the wide range of estimates for oil revenue and national debt provided by
the UK and Scottish Governments made it impossible to predict exactly what
would happen following a Yes vote.
But
the economic think tank said that for Scotland to be wealthier, it would have
to strike a deal with Westminster to repay only half of its population share of
the UK’s national debt while receiving almost twice the predicted income from
the North Sea.
If
Scotland inherited its full population share of the UK’s national debt, as
expected, then oil revenues would have to meet the First Minister’s most
optimistic possible forecast if it was not to be poorer.
The
analysis was conducted in the wake of the Treasury’s claim the Union is worth
£1,400 annually for every Scot, while Mr Salmond claimed independence could be
worth £1,000 per person after 15 years.
Further
Reading:
Alex
Salmond's borrowing plans 'prove currency union won't happen'
“Fiscal Affairs
Scotland’s independent analysis
demonstrates again that the Scottish Government’s fantasy figures do not stand
up to scrutiny. A separate Scotland means
higher taxes and less money to spend on vital public services.”
Independent
Scotland's debt 'would force spending cuts or tax rises'
Scots to to set their own income tax if they reject independence, under deal between Cameron, Clegg and Miliband. Daily Mail
Joint declaration promises more financial
powers if independence is blocked
David
Cameron, Ed Miliband and Nick Clegg have backed the deal
Comes on
the day of a TV debate between Alex Salmond and Alistair Darling
Scotland currently raises 15
per cent of its £30billion budget
David Cameron, Ed Miliband and Nick
Clegg have signed a joint declaration that promises more financial powers for
Scotland if it rejects independence.
The move by the leaders of the three
main parties is an attempt to rubbish claims by Alex Salmond that Westminster
will not deliver more devolution if Scots vote ‘no’.
It comes ahead of tonight's TV debate
between Scottish First Minister Mr Salmond and Alistair Darling, the former
Labour Chancellor who fronts the pro-union Better Together campaign.
There are just over six weeks to go
until voters in Scotland decide whether to remain in the UK or become an
independent nation in the September 18 referendum.
Polls have so far failed to show a majority in favour of independence,
but both campaigns are hoping to receive a boost as a result of tonight’s TV
debate. The six leaders’ declaration states: ‘We support a strong Scottish
Parliament in a strong United Kingdom.
‘We now pledge to strengthen further
the powers of the Scottish Parliament, in particular in the areas of fiscal
responsibility and social security.’
Currently, control over council tax and business rates means the
Scottish Government raises about 15 per cent of its £30billion budget, with the
majority of public spending funded by
a block grant from the UK Treasury.
Scottish
Independence, a Vehicle for Alex Salmond's Grandiose Ego ?
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
Today's post
Jesus Christ, The Same Yesterday, Today and Forever
I had the privilege to be raised in a Christian Home and had the input of my parents and grandparents into my life, they were ...
-
Recently, I have found that I have a lot of free time, due to circumstances, although I have been spending time with some ...
-
Living a Life without Limits. I’m going to ask you to think about this question and I would like you to pray abou...