During
the 2003 Scottish elections I found myself walking around the back streets of
Dundee with Alex Salmond. He was not then leader of the Scottish Nationalists,
though he had been, and would soon be again. I remember him as an amiable and
rumpled figure.
At
one of our pit-stops he said something that chilled my blood. He told me that
in 20 years, if not before, Scotland would be an independent country. He
asserted this so calmly and confidently that it was hard to disbelieve him.
I
wonder whether Tuesday evening’s debate with Alistair Darling will mark the
point when Mr Salmond and the rest of the world began to realise that his
prophecy of an independent Scotland has been confounded, at any rate for a
generation.
And
I also wonder whether the debate might remind Labour that Mr Darling (still
only 60) is a considerable but often underrated politician who in most respects
stands head and shoulders above the party’s present leader, Ed Miliband.
The debate had been billed as a contest
between the wily, charming Mr Salmond, and the boring, bank managerish Mr
Darling. Some supporters of the Union had had so many qualms about the former
Chancellor that there had been private talk of replacing him with the more
pugnacious John Reid, a Cabinet minister in the Blair administration.
In
the event, though, it was the supposedly plodding Mr Darling who easily won the
day. An instant Guardian/ICM poll after the debate gave him victory by 56 per
cent to 44 per cent. It is hard to find anyone even in the Yes camp who thinks
their man did well.
By
the way, let me say how outrageous it was that the contest could not be viewed
south of the border except online, and even then the picture was often
interrupted. These two men were discussing the future of our country, Britain,
and yet most citizens of the United Kingdom were excluded from the debate.
Further
reading here:
No comments:
Post a Comment