For
some time now I have been arguing that the whole of the UK must respond to the
clear demand for constitutional change, and earlier this week I proposed a
timetable to deliver a stronger Scottish parliament. But Scots are also leading
the discussion on a new idea of citizenship for the global era, one that
recognises the strength of national identity and wants to bring power closer to
the people. Yet it also understands that, after wave after wave of
globalisation, our ability to seize opportunities and make rights come alive is
now being shaped within a vast network of global economic interrelationships –
a network over which we feel we have too little power.
When
I set out plans for a more modern constitution in 2007 I was thinking of a new
citizenship for the global era. Our later measures – parliament's power to
declare peace and war, MPs to be subject to a right to recall, an end to the
royal prerogative, an elected Lords – were about a 21st-century democracy, with
citizenship to be founded on a new bill of rights and responsibilities and, in
time, a written constitution. There was little public or media appetite for
change at that time. The MPs' expenses crisis should have triggered sweeping
reforms but, in the wake of the global economic collapse, all talk of
constitutional change had to take second place to preventing an economic
recession from turning into a full blown depression and to getting us back to
growth.
But
across Europe we are now seeing the rise of both anti-establishment,
anti-immigrant parties of the right and secessionist movements, such as the one
in Scotland. It is not just because of the referendum that Scotland has moved
centre stage – there are two other reasons. First: because of Scotland's
experience of the most dramatic deindustrialisation we have become more aware
of how our future rights and opportunities are tied to managing globalisation
better. And second: because of our unique experience of being a stateless
nation – which has for 300 years seen benefits in cooperation across nations –
we have a unique contribution to make to what citizenship means for a more
interdependent world.
Twice
since 1707, Scots have redefined ideas of what citizenship means. First, the
Scots Enlightenment gave the world the idea of civil society, of a citizen who
is neither subject nor just consumer, and of a modern citizenship that stands
between markets and states. Then, as they confronted the turmoil and injustices
of the industrial revolution, Scots led the way to a 20th-century citizenship
that guarantees social and economic as well as civil and political rights.
In
the post-union, stateless Scotland of the 18th and early 19th centuries, Scots
Enlightenment philosophers taught people to think of themselves as both
citizens of their local community and citizens of the world. From Adam Smith
and David Hume came the idea of the "civil" society, which taught us
there was a space between the state and the individual, a public sphere that
need not be dominated by markets and where people could come together in their
own voluntary associations, from churches and trade unions to civic and
municipal organisations.
Read
more here:
No comments:
Post a Comment