Showing posts with label Money and Debt/Financial Developments. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Money and Debt/Financial Developments. Show all posts

Saturday 28 December 2013

Grayling fury at EU bid to bring in even more 'human rights': Justice Secretary says plan is 'absurd' power grab, Daily Mail


  • If introduced, it is feared they could lead to a deluge of claims against businesses and the Government
  • Contained in the EU's controversial Charter of Fundamental Rights
  • Mr Grayling said the suggestion showed Eurocrats were aiming to create a European justice system that overrides domestic courts
Chris Grayling today condemns Brussels over an 'absurd' proposal to bring dozens of new European human rights into British law
Chris Grayling today condemns Brussels over an 'absurd' proposal to bring dozens of new European human rights into British law
Justice Secretary Chris Grayling today condemns Brussels over an ‘absurd’ proposal to bring dozens of new European human rights into British law.
If introduced, it is feared they could lead to a deluge of claims against  businesses and the Government.
The rights are contained in the European Union’s controversial Charter of Fundamental Rights. The UK opted out of the charter in 1998, but now the European Comission has suggested it could be imposed on all member states.
Mr Grayling said the suggestion showed Eurocrats were aiming to create a European justice system that overrides domestic courts. 
‘This country never wanted a charter of fundamental rights and the idea we would sign up to changes that meant it took over our domestic laws is absurd,’ the  Justice Secretary said.
‘The European Commission should stop trying to create a European justice system, and should let member states get on with solving the real challenges we all face.’ His intervention marks a significant stepping up in Tory efforts to demonstrate how they want a looser, more trade-based relationship with the EU ahead of the European  elections in May.
Mr Grayling’s anger has been prompted by a document produced by the European Commission suggesting that the charter should apply in all member states.
The blueprint, which contains 54 provisions – including the right to strike and the right to collective bargaining – was attached to the EU’s controversial Lisbon Treaty.
 
The then PM Tony Blair told MPs it was ‘absolutely clear that we have an opt-out’ from the charter. But a new consultation document calls for it to be implemented throughout the EU.
It says people’s ‘interests in and expectations about the enforcement of fundamental rights by the EU are high’. It goes on to suggest that ‘one option would be to make all fundamental rights guaranteed in the charter directly applicable in member states.’ 
Mr Grayling's anger has been prompted by a document produced by the European Commission suggesting that the charter should apply in all member states
Mr Grayling's anger has been prompted by a document produced by the European Commission suggesting that the charter should apply in all member states
The Human Rights Act 1998 incorporated into our domestic law large parts, but not all, of the  European Convention on Human Rights. Some parts were  deliberately omitted by Parliament. The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union contains all of the missing parts and many further provisions.
The new discussion document also suggests a stronger role for the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights, though it concedes the steps proposed would require the agreement of member states. Mr Grayling said a Tory-led government would never agree to the proposal to adopt the charter.
However, many of the rights in the charter would be greeted with delight by trade unions who are likely to pressure Labour to accept them. 
In the field of employment law, the charter guarantees rights in areas such as collective bargaining, unjustified dismissal, ‘fair and just’ working conditions and maternity and parental leave.
Mr Grayling will play a key part in Tory efforts to rein in the influence of European human rights law, which has stalled under the Coalition because of the fierce resistance of the Liberal Democrats. 
Earlier this year, Mr Justice Mostyn also expressed concern about the potential influence of the charter
Earlier this year, Mr Justice Mostyn also expressed concern about the potential influence of the charter
The Justice Secretary is understood to be considering draft  legislation setting out how a  Conservative-only government would replace Labour’s Human Rights Act with a British Bill of Rights and reassert the authority of the Supreme Court over the European courts.
He argues that the creeping influence of European courts in British law is unacceptable and underlines the case for renegotiating Britain’s membership of the EU.
Earlier this year, a senior judge also expressed concern about the potential influence of the charter.
Mr Justice Mostyn’s comments came in a judgment on the case of an asylum seeker whose barrister cited the document in a failed bid to win his case. 
The judge said he was ‘surprised, to say the least,’ by the claim, adding: ‘I was sure the British government had secured an opt-out at the negotiations of the Lisbon Treaty’. Yet the European Court had suggested that the opt-out ‘does not intend to exempt the UK from the obligations to comply with the provisions of the charter’.
The Conservative pledge is likely to be revived in the next Tory manifesto after being underlined by a draft Bill. 
Some Tories – including several Cabinet ministers – want to go  further and withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights.
Last night a spokesman for the European Commission said: ‘This paper was published several months ago to stimulate debate at a conference in November.
‘It had a disclaimer saying it did not represent the position of the European Commission. Changes to the Charter – which covers only EU law – could indeed only be made if the UK signed up to them.’


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2530182/Grayling-fury-EU-bid-bring-human-rights-Justice-Secretary-says-plan-absurd-power-grab.html#ixzz2omZ6OfSY
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Thursday 5 September 2013

Fury as UN meddlers send in human rights team over 'bedroom tax': Officials sent to check houses 'provide adequate standard of living', Daily Mail


  • The visit of Brazilian Raquel Rolnik been criticised by MPs 
  • She will carry out inspection of housing conditions to check they provide 'an adequate standard of living' 
  • MPs dismissed UN official as 'over-mighty and unaccountable'

With the crisis in Syria and all the world’s many other problems, you would think that the UN had quite enough on its plate.
But apparently it can spare a top official to investigate a potential human rights abuse in Britain…changes to housing benefit, called the ‘bedroom tax’ by Left-wingers.
Brazilian Raquel Rolnik has been dispatched to Britain to carry out an inspection of housing conditions to check they provide ‘an adequate standard of living’.
UN official Raquel Rolnik will visit Britain to carry out an inspection of housing conditions to check they provide 'an adequate standard of living'
UN official Raquel Rolnik will visit Britain to carry out an inspection of housing conditions to check they provide 'an adequate standard of living'
The news provoked a furious reaction from MPs, who dismissed the bureaucrat as ‘over-mighty and unaccountable’.
And it is not the first time that a UN bureaucrat has travelled to the UK to lecture the Government.
 
Two years ago UN adviser Professor Yves Cabannes joined protesters at Dale Farm in Essex to condemn the eviction of hundreds of travellers from illegal pitches, insisting their removal was in breach of human rights rules.
A spokesman for Mrs Rolnik, described as the special rapporteur on housing for the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, said she was ‘visiting the country at the invitation of the Government’.
However, it is understood that she in fact invited herself, and the Coalition’s welcome was extended only out of diplomatic etiquette. Indeed, ministers are thought to be privately unhappy at her decision to make an inspection.
The changes to housing benefit, called the 'bedroom tax', provoked protests earlier this year
The changes to housing benefit, called the 'bedroom tax', provoked protests earlier this year
Cuts in housing benefit for claimants who live in larger homes with spare bedrooms, introduced in April, will be at the centre of her inquiry.
The reforms, which ministers claim will knock £500million off the housing benefit bill, have become a central rallying cause of Labour and the Left against the Coalition, with critics claiming they amount to ‘social cleansing’ by forcing thousands from their homes.
The UN Human Rights office  described Mrs Rolnik’s inquiry as ‘the first information-gathering visit to the country by an independent expert designated by the UN Human Rights Council to monitor and promote the realisation of the right to adequate housing and the right to non-discrimination’.
Mrs Rolnik said: ‘The UK faces a unique moment, when the challenge to promote and protect the right to adequate housing is on the agenda.
‘Special attention needs to be given to responding to the specific situations of various population groups, in particular low-income households and other marginalised individuals and groups.’ 
Tory MPs Jake Berry (left) and Douglas Carswell (right) criticised the inspection. Mr Berry said she does not 'represent the views of Britons who want to get on in life'
Tory MPs Jake Berry (left) and Douglas Carswell (right) criticised the inspection. Mr Berry said she does not 'represent the views of Britons who want to get on in life'
Tory MPs Jake Berry (left) and Douglas Carswell (right) criticised the inspection. Mr Berry said she does not 'represent the views of Britons who want to get on in life' 
She will tour London, Manchester, Edinburgh, Glasgow and Belfast, meeting officials, human rights activists and protest groups. She plans to present preliminary findings and recommendations as soon as next week.
Douglas Carswell, Tory MP for Clacton, responded furiously to the visit, saying: ‘It may be news to Mrs Rolnik, but in this country we have something called democracy. This means people vote for their representatives. They decide how the country is run, and not overpaid, over-mighty and unaccountable UN officials.’
In the past Mrs Rolnik has criticised the ‘negative side-effects’ of the spread of home ownership and the sale of council houses in the UK.
Jake Berry, Tory MP for Rossendale and Darwen, added: ‘This rapporteur is a self-professed enemy of home ownership and right to buy, and doesn’t represent the views of Britons who want to get on in life.’


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2411881/UN-officials-sent-check-bedroom-tax-houses-provide-adequate-standard-living.html#ixzz2e00eBLpy
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Sunday 25 August 2013

Britain's child poverty 'social apartheid': Problems faced by the young are worse than 1960s claim researchers


  • The report was carried out by leading charity National Children's Bureau
  • Warns that Britain is at risk of becoming a place where rich and poor children live in separate, parallel worlds 
  • The report compares data collected from a study called Born To Fail published in 1969 
A report has found that child poverty is now a bigger problem than during the 1960s
A report has found that child poverty is now a bigger problem than during the 1960s
Child poverty is now a bigger problem than during the 1960s, a damning report to be published this week has found. 
The report was carried out by the National Children's Bureau and warns that Britain is at risk of becoming a place where 'children's lives are so polarised that rich and poor live in separate, parallel worlds.' 
It blames a 'failure of political will' has resulted in poorer children having fewer chances in life today. 
The report compares children's lives with data collected from a study called Born To Fail published in 1969. 
It found that around 3.6million children are now living in relative poverty today compared with 2million in the late 1960s. 
According to the report, a child from a disadvantage background is less likely to develop as quickly by the age of four than a child from a more affluent family. 
Children living in deprived areas are also more likely to be the victim of an unintentional injury or accident at home and are nine times less likely to have green spaces to play.
While boys living in deprived areas are three times more likely to be obese than boys growing up in affluent areas compared with girls who are twice as likely to be obese. 
 
It also notes that 63 per cent of children living in poverty have at least one parent or carer who is working.  
The report reads: 'Today, although there have been some improvements, overall the situation appears to be no better, and in some respects has got worse.' 
The charity says that if Britain tried to be more like other European countries, there would be less children dying from unintentional injuries, 320,000 more teenagers would be in education or training and nearly 45,000 11-year-olds would not be obese.
The report compares children's lives with data collected from a study called Born To Fail published in 1969
The report compares children's lives with data collected from a study called Born To Fail published in 1969
The charity is calling on the government to do more to stop the widening gap between children living in poverty and children from more affluent families. 
The report says: 'The government made a commitment to protect pensioner benefits but there has been no equivalent commitment to protect children living in the poorest families or to tackle child poverty.' 
Dr Hilary Emery, chief executive of the National Children’s Bureau, said: 'Our analysis shows that despite some improvements, the inequality and disadvantage suffered by poorer children 50 years ago still persists today.
'There is a real risk that as a nation we are sleep walking into a world where children grow up in a state of social apartheid, with poor children destined to experience hardship and disadvantage just by accident of birth, and their more affluent peers unaware of their existence.
'All our children should have the opportunity to fulfil their potential regardless of their circumstances. We cannot afford to let them grow up in such an unequal ‘them and us’ society in which the talents of the next generation are wasted, leaving them cut adrift to become a costly burden to the economy rather than a productive asset.
'This is a critical moment of opportunity to tackle the child poverty and inequality that has been a permanent feature in our country for five decades.
'Government has a major role to play in leading the way to address this but there must also be a wider mobilisation of efforts and resources led by politicians from every party and involving charities, businesses and communities all playing a part in having greater expectations for every child.'


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2401664/Britains-child-poverty-social-apartheid-Problems-faced-young-worse-1960s-claim-researchers.html#ixzz2czZxKEmL
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

The secret plane stuffed full of cash that saved the euro: When Greece burned and its banks melted, the EU talked tough and threatened to cut it loose... but covertly flooded it with 10 Billion Euros


  • The European bank Troika boosted Greek banks through secret flights
  • Billions of euros were flown to Greece and Cyprus to save the currency

To the casual observer there was nothing odd or even surprising in the sight of cargo planes lumbering east over the Adriatic or occasionally skimming southwards over the Alps towards the Balkans and beyond to Greece.
Some of these aircraft, giant  Boeings, bore the distinctive livery of Maersk, the international carriers. Others, smaller, more discreet, were painted in the pale blue and white of the Greek military.
Had anyone bothered to pay attention, or even note down the serial numbers – such as the plane marked OY-SRH seen landing in Cyprus earlier this year – surely they would not have guessed at the purpose of these journeys or their extraordinary cargo.
Rescue mission: Maersk flights to Athens and Larnaca carried billions-worth of euros on each flight to save the Greek economy
Rescue mission: Maersk flights to Athens and Larnaca carried billions-worth of euros on each flight to save the Greek - and the eurozone - economy
Because the flights to Athens and Larnaca that began in 2011 were nothing short of a secret airlift.
The mission was neither to save lives nor even to preserve a fragile democratic freedom like the famous airlifts in post-war Berlin, but to protect and prolong the  economic experiment of a multi-national currency. Billions in freshly minted euro notes made a clandestine journey to struggling Greece – a drama worthy of a John Le Carré novel but authored in Frankfurt am Main, known as Mainhattan, world headquarters of the euro.
 
It was well known that Greece was running out of cash, in metaphorical terms at least. In June 2011, after months of stalling on its economic reform programme, the foreign Troika that effectively controlled the country had run out of patience.
Consisting of the European Union, the European Central Bank and  the International Monetary Fund, the Troika made it clear that it would withhold the final instalment of a €110 billion bailout, agreed in May 2010. This last €12 billion payment of foreign funds was needed desperately – to pay pensions,  public servants and interest on Greece’s huge debts. It was funding that Greece could raise neither in taxes from its own people, nor from the financial markets.
But what most people did not know was that Greece was running out of cash quite literally, too.
There were shortages of all denominations apart from the €10 note. Greeks had responded to the Troika’s threat to pull the €12 billion payment by withdrawing euros from their bank accounts at a record rate.
On the brink: Protesters clash with riot police in Athens, Greece, as its government was teetering on the edge of collapse over the austerity measures
On the brink: Protesters clash with riot police in Athens, Greece, as its government was teetering on the edge of collapse over the austerity measures
Soon there would be not enough euro notes in the country to cope with the number of Greeks trying to get their hands on their money from cash machines and banks. And so a secret plan was activated.  ‘We’re talking about June 2011,’ a senior official overseeing Greece’s bailout told me. ‘Greeks were taking about one to two billion euros a day from the banking system. The Greeks had to send military planes to Italy to get banknotes. It got to that point.’
A decade after it gave up the drachma, the world’s oldest existing currency, Greece faced the crushing reality that it did not have the sovereign authority to meet the demand for paper currency from its own citizens.
It could mint euro coins and there were also plates for the €10 note. But coins and small denomination paper were not going to satisfy the demand.
Only the German Bundesbank, the National Bank of Austria and the Luxembourgers have ever had the plates for the highly prized €500 note, the highest-value paper currency in the world. (This form of manufacturing would appear to have been confined to German-speaking countries.)
Intentionally or not, the ability of Greece to meet a huge surge in demand for banknotes had been effectively proscribed.
By June 2012, Greek demand for paper currency had nearly trebled and amid last summer’s electoral tumult, the secret missions started in 2011 were once again required.
The response was extraordinary. While issuing public threats to Greeks, in private the Troika authorised military and commercial cargo planes to feed them euros – billions-worth on every flight. They were intended not only to preserve Greece’s fracturing social stability, but also to preserve the single currency itself.
Greece’s European partners were worried, and  no wonder. The Governor of the Bank of Greece, George Provopoulos, subsequently explained that  if the demand for notes had not been met, an impression would have been created that the banks were unable to repay depositors.
‘It would have caused a collapse of confidence with dire consequences for financial stability and the general outlook of the country,’ he said.
A Northern Rock-style bank run in Greece could have spread quickly across the Mediterranean – investor concern had already spread to Italy.
A Troika figure told me: ‘There would have been complete and immediate panic. They had no time.
A billion, two billion per day  in banknotes is a lot of money. This then becomes an industrial problem.’
The airlift was only the first stage of the mission. Scores, if not hundreds, of journeys by truck and boat spread the new notes  across the mainland and  the Greek islands, from Rhodes to Corfu, from Crete to Komotini. Staff worked through the night to ensure that bank branches across Greece had sufficient notes to meet depositor demand, and contain any incipient bank run.
Incredibly, this operation proceeded without anyone noticing. The Bank of Greece tracked demand for paper money through bank branch orders. It did not have to deploy teams of ‘bank-run spotters’ as the Bank of England did in the crisis of 2008.
As far as ordinary Greeks were  concerned, the cash machines continued to function. However, underneath their very noses a monetary revolution was taking place.
The value of notes in circulation in Greece doubled from €19 billion in 2009 to €40 billion in September 2011. By the summer of 2012 the total had reached €48 billion, of which at least €10 billion – possibly much more –  had been delivered through secret airlifts.
Typically, developed economies have cash in circulation worth between four and seven per cent of gross domestic product. In 2009 in Greece, the figure was 8.2 per cent. By 2012 it had trebled to 24.8 per cent.
On these numbers, in mid-2012, Greece had a greater value of euro notes in circulation than the Netherlands, even though the Dutch economy is four times that of Greece.
Tens of billions of euros were yanked from Greek banks in the bank runs of 2011 and 2012, yet the authorities estimate only a third of it was spent. Another third was taken abroad for investments in, for example, London property, and a third was hidden under mattresses and floorboards in Greek homes.
It was not long before Greece’s near neighbour and cultural sibling, Cyprus, found that it too was in crisis. This time, Berlin was determined that a large chunk of the bailout would come from savings deposited in Cypriot banks. Bedlam, bank holidays and bank runs were the predictable result. As dusk fell over Nicosia on March 27 this year, the shouts of protesters were drowned out by the angry buzzing of helicopters and deafening wail of police sirens.
Safely kept: Money is seen stored overnight at Central Bank of Cyprus
Safely kept: Money is seen stored overnight at Central Bank of Cyprus
The uproar seemed to be converging on the Central Bank. Had the previous day’s sit-down protest by bank workers turned into a riot?
The truth was much stranger.
At the Central Bank, tense meetings between international financiers, American management consultants, British Treasury advisers and Cypriot bankers suddenly broke off. Four very large green juggernauts laden with euros had arrived from the European Central Bank, just hours before Cyprus’s banks were due to reopen.
An historic just-in-time delivery. That afternoon a Maersk Star Air cargo plane had parked up at the end of the runway at Larnaca airport. Flight logs record that the plane, registration OY-SRH, had flown from Cologne to Munich in the early hours, and then, via Athens, to Larnaca. It was carrying €5 billion euros in notes – not a bailout, but  an epic logistical effort to sate the Cypriot desire for paper money.
The cash had been transferred from the Bundesbank logistical reserve at the request of the ECB. But only after the Cypriot government had done its ‘homework’,  complying with Troika demands for economic and financial reform.
After the notes had been loaded on to the trucks, their journey to Nicosia was accompanied by squads of police cars, while helicopters buzzed overhead. The cash had come courtesy of Cyprus’s real central bank, the one based in Frankfurt, 1,500 miles away – the European Central Bank. Effectively, the ECB’s threat made a week before to pull emergency liquidity funding to the island’s banks was a threat to withhold the cash that arrived on this plane. The consequences would have been dire.
It is perhaps understandable that this and the other cash flights remained clandestine but, in their secrecy and urgency, they offer a window to a still more extraordinary landscape of lies and half-truths told across the continent to keep the single currency alive.
Greece’s membership of the eurozone was, from inception, built on misleading data about the state of its economy. The Cypriot entry in 2008 was waved through, yet only now have the Cypriots been told that their main industry, an offshore banking sector, needs to be dismantled amid fears that it has aided tax evasion and money laundering.
But even these extraordinary lapses pale into insignificance against the two mega lies – untruths in the very structure of the euro – which persist even now, despite the seemingly calmer weather in the currency bloc. A blueprint for revival is being drawn up in the German headquarters of the European Central Bank. The ECB is in absolutely no doubt that the euro will survive.
But the people of the crisis countries – Spain, Portugal, Greece, Cyprus, Italy and Ireland – are yet to be enlightened by their politicians about the price to be paid: in short, the survival of the euro means much lower wages for them. 
To use the jargon, the  Mediterranean countries must be ‘internally devalued’, which means pushing down average wages that had risen sharply, to regain competitiveness and promote growth. The existence of a common currency means, of course, that old-fashioned currency devaluation – the standard method of achieving these things in the past – is impossible.
I know for a fact that two ministers in charge of struggling Mediterranean economies (sadly, they must remain anonymous) are happy to boast about the scale of the cuts in workers’ wages when addressing international bond traders. Would they ever dream of saying this in public? Decisively not.
‘The public would not take it,’ one crisis economy minister tells me.
Meanwhile, even in the final weeks of a German election campaign (which Angela Merkel seems likely to win) the voters remain ignorant that they too must pay a price: that they are about to foot a bill of  billions of euros as Greece heads inexorably for a third bailout.
It will happen safely after the votes are counted, of course.
Germany benefited the most from the introduction of the euro through trade within Europe, a cheaper currency for exports outside Europe, and ultra-low interest rates on its debts. But it now seems inevitable that northern European taxpayers, and German ones in particular, will bear a heavy share of the cost of rescuing the currency.
After all, the northern European taxpayer has effectively replaced bankers in funding Greece’s remaining debts. The first test will come from Greece, which will soon require a remarkable third bailout and yet another default on its debt, having already had the world’s biggest sovereign default in 2012.
This will be just the start of a process where public debts across the eurozone are shared. A de facto  fiscal union and, soon enough, a form of ‘banking union’ will follow.
Underlying all of this will be political union – a super state.
The Maersk Star Air OY-SRH that landed in Larnaca five months ago was the equivalent of a printing press in a nation that had ceded its monetary sovereignty. Such planes are a visible symbol of the loss of national power necessary to prevent the currency itself from crashing.
After the German elections next month, this truth will be revealed. A resumption of the airborne rescue missions is possible; turbulence is guaranteed. Fasten your seatbelts.
This is an edited extract from The Default Line: The Inside Story Of People, Banks And Entire Nations On The Edge, by Faisal Islam, published by Head of Zeus at £15.99. To buy  a copy for £12.49 with free UK p&p, call the Mail Book Shop on 0844 472 4157 or visit mailbookshop.co.uk


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2401410/The-secret-plane-stuffed-cash-saved-euro-When-Greece-burned-banks-melted-EU-talked-tough-threatened-cut-loose--covertly-flooded-10billion.html#ixzz2cxbsCGOh
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Saturday 24 August 2013

Benefits, a council house and non-stop partying. It's a tough old life being a fracking protester!, from the Daily Mail

  • One organiser said at least half Balcombe protesters are on benefits
  • Philip Lardo, 52, a druid, also has council house in Brighton
  • Police complain site is becoming a 'free festival' after anarchists from Spain, France, Holland and Poland, among others, joined the party
  • Cost of policing operation already £2.3million - likely to end up at £3.7million
  • Majority of local residents oppose fracking, but a growing number are tiring of the chaos

Support: Philip Lardo, pictured in full druid dress, is protesting at the Cuadrilla site in Balcombe but normally lives in a council house in Brighton
Support: Philip Lardo, pictured in full druid dress, is protesting at the Cuadrilla site in Balcombe but normally lives in a council house in Brighton
Each morning, 52-year-old Philip Lardo wakes up, lights a camp fire, parks his backside in a deckchair, and rolls a cigarette.
For most of the past three weeks, he’s been living in a tent by the B2036 in Sussex, where he’s spent days relaxing in the sun, or visiting the local shop to stock up on tobacco, snack food and drinking water.
At meal times, Lardo adjourns to a marquee a few hundred yards away to queue up for the home-cooked food that is served free of charge to residents of the leafy site where his tent is pitched.
‘For lunch today, we had Tuscan bean stew,’ he tells me. ‘They served it with bread and rice. It was pretty tasty, if you like that kind of thing.’
In the evenings, he likes to sit around the fire listening to bongo drums and guitar music, or — if he’s feeling energetic — wander to the local pub, the Half Moon.
It sounds, on the face of it, like an idyllic way to spend August. And, as he relaxes in the sunshine, Lardo looks every inch the happy camper. But he isn’t on what you might call a traditional summer holiday; quite the reverse, in fact. 
For, as the crowds of uniformed police officers circling warily in the distance suggest, we are at what is currently the country’s most high-profile political demonstration. Lardo is one of the several hundred protesters who have taken up residence on grass verges near the pretty commuter village of Balcombe.
They are lobbying against an operation by the energy company Cuadrilla, which has started exploratory drilling several thousand feet beneath the rolling countryside of rural Sussex.
Environmentalists fear the Balcombe site could in future be used for fracking, a controversial extraction technique in which pressurised liquid is pumped deep underground to release oil and gas trapped within shale rock.
They have therefore pledged to remain at the scene until the drilling is stopped.
The demo began quietly last month, when a few dozen concerned locals began picketing the site. They were soon joined by Lardo and other activists from across the country, including designer Dame Vivienne Westwood, and perennial activist and ex-rock wife Bianca Jagger.
The group scored a major victory last Friday when drilling was suspended altogether, on the advice of police, after several hundred new protesters arrived for a pre-planned five-day rally.
The suspension was lifted a few days later. But not before the authorities had been accused of surrendering to ‘mob rule’.
On Monday, on a day of so-called ‘direct action’, more than 30 people were arrested for blocking access to the Cuadrilla site, including the Green Party MP Caroline Lucas, whose plight helped place the demo on the front pages.
Noisy: Demonstrators making their voice heard at the drilling site on Monday
Noisy: Demonstrators making their voice heard at the drilling site on Monday
Since then, police helicopters have buzzed almost constantly in the skies above Balcombe, where more than 400 officers from across the country have been deployed.
Yesterday, Sussex Police said the operation had already cost £2.3 million, and is likely to eventually set the taxpayer back some £3.7 million.
The lanes around the usually picturesque village are now filled with riot vans, and coverage of events has helped spark a national debate about the pros and cons of fracking.
Yet at the centre of this expensive circus lie some pressing, unanswered questions. Who exactly are these well-organised eco-warriors? Where did they really come from? Just who is bankrolling their long-running protest? And have the once supportive villagers of Balcombe started to tire of the noisy activists in their midst?
Lardo makes for an instructive case study. While organisers of the Balcombe protest do much to play up its local roots, he, like most of the colourful demonstrators, has no connection to the village. Instead, Lardo has a council house in Brighton. But for most of the year, this publicly-funded property lies empty, since he chooses to live in the woods of Sussex — as a druid.
Gathering pace: The protest began quietly last month with a few concerned locals but has now become the country's most high-profile political demonstration
Gathering pace: The protest began quietly last month with a few concerned locals but has now become the country's most high-profile political demonstration
The job doesn’t always see him wearing traditional druid’s robes but it does allow him to spend weeks on end at ‘direct action’ protests.
With this in mind, Lardo spent the early months of 2013 on the outskirts of Hove, attempting to prevent the construction of a new bypass. When that protest petered out, he moved to Balcombe.
‘As druids, we revere nature and we revere the Earth,’ he says. ‘It’s where we live. Nature is our birthright. That’s why we try to save it.’ Lardo is, of course, entitled to spend his time as he wishes. But like many of fellow protesters, his activist lifestyle turns out to be entirely funded by the taxpayer.
‘Druids aren’t paid, so I am officially unemployed,’ he says, when I ask about his finances. ‘I happen to sign on. I get roughly £80 a week for that. Then, because I’ve got osteoporosis in my knees, hip and toes, I also get disability of around £100 a month.’
Controversial: The protesters are objecting to the process of fracking - a technique which involves pumping liquid deep underground to release oil and gas
Controversial: The protesters are objecting to the process of fracking - a technique which involves pumping liquid deep underground to release oil and gas
The money is deposited in Lardo’s bank account each week, as he sits in his deckchair. And among residents of the Balcombe protest site, precious few appear to be gainfully employed.
Also camping nearby, for example, is full-time protester Natalie Hynde, the 30-year-old daughter of Pretenders singer Chrissie and The Kinks frontman Ray Davies. She and her unemployed boyfriend Simon ‘Sitting Bull’ Medhurst, a 55-year-old veteran eco-warrior, were arrested on Monday for ‘supergluing’ themselves to the site’s entrance gates.
Rodney Jago, a retiree and resident of Balcombe, says that’s typical of his village’s new residents.
‘One of the organisers told me that at least 50 per cent are on benefits,’ Jago says. ‘He was quite shameless about it; didn’t think it was at all embarrassing. It’s like a free holiday for these people. They wave a placard from time to time, but basically all they do is sit in a deckchair, getting free food, while their kids run wild.’
This week anarchists from Spain, France, Holland and Poland, among others, joined the party. Their presence led police to complain that the village has turned into a ‘free festival’ for professional agitators.
One new arrival, from Malaga, said: ‘I was in London and going back to Europe when I heard about this. I’ve only recently learnt about fracking, but thought this would be fun.’
A group of French squatters, who had been living in a derelict house in Islington, North London, meanwhile said they had now moved to Balcombe because ‘the weather is really good and everyone is friendly’.
So how many of the people at the demo really care about fracking?
It’s hard to tell. But many of those involved in Reclaim the Power, a mysterious organisation whose supporters turned up in vast numbers this week, appear to have little connection with the issue.
In its literature, Reclaim the Power says it’s a coalition of ‘member groups’ that include UK Uncut — lobbyists against David Cameron’s spending cuts — Occupy London, who were behind last year’s anti-capitalist protests at St Paul’s Cathedral, and the Greater London Pensioners Association. Other members include a pro-Labour group called Disabled People Against Cuts, along with officials from the powerful trade unions Unite and the far-Left RMT, which supposedly represents transport workers.
Profile: The arrest of Green Party MP Caroline Lucas at the protest brought it to the front pages
Profile: The arrest of Green Party MP Caroline Lucas at the protest brought it to the front pages
Quite why such outfits should take a strong position (or indeed any position) on fracking, and want to be pulling strings in Balcombe, remains unclear.
Some observers wonder if they are merely ‘piggybacking’ the issue for political reasons. The Tory MP Jacob Rees-Mogg has decried demonstrators as a ‘rent-a-mob’, saying that ‘buses of hooligans’ had come to the village to party and cause trouble.
The most curious organisation behind the protest is surely Fuel Poverty Action, listed in the protest camp’s handbook (yes, it has its own handbook), as one of its major organisers. This group supposedly exists to campaign against high energy prices. But in the U.S., a fracking boom has helped reduce domestic gas prices by about a quarter.
So why does Fuel Poverty Action see fit to lobby against the introduction of the technology in the UK? A Reclaim the Power spokesman will say only that it sees fracking as ‘part of the way that the big six energy companies are exploiting the vulnerable in society’.
From a distance, the camp resembled a poor man’s Glastonbury, with hundreds of tents pitched around a selection of stages and marquees. Up close, the smell of BO mingled with an occasional whiff of marijuana. Residents seemed friendly, though their ranks included at least two undercover reporters.
Placards could be seen supporting gay rights, opposing the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, advertising a pro-migrant demonstration in Calais, and calling for an end to animal testing.
Shameless: When anarchists from elsewhere in Europe began to turn up, police complained the protest was becoming a 'free festival' for professional agitators
Shameless: When anarchists from elsewhere in Europe began to turn up, police complained the protest was becoming a 'free festival' for professional agitators
During the afternoon, I spotted three representatives of the local Labour party, wearing red rosettes and campaigning on site on behalf of Alan Rew, a county council election candidate.
Their presence was surely the height of hypocrisy: Labour is cautiously in favour of the technology.
The identity of the key people at the camp remains somewhat obscure. Reclaim the Power calls itself a ‘horizontal’ protest organisation, meaning it has no official leader.
Its finances are also opaque. Some chemical toilets used by protesters have been funded by Greenpeace. Free vegan meals are being provided by a non-profit organisation called ‘Veggies’. Campers seemed unsure who was funding their smart marquee tents and printed literature.
The group was originally formed by 21 environmental activists who were arrested and prosecuted after occupying West Burton coal-fired power station, in Nottinghamshire, last year.
Several are Oxbridge educated, and hail from highly privileged backgrounds. One, Danielle Paffard, studied at Wadham College, Oxford, while her father, Roger, used to be chief executive of High Street chocolatier Thorntons and stationery giant Staples.
Another is Ewa Jasiewicz, 35, a veteran far-Left activist who is best known for campaigning against the Iraq war and being a leader of the Free Gaza Movement, which in 2011 attempted to send a flotilla of ships laden with provisions to the Gaza Strip. She certainly knows how to organise a protest.
Expensive: Sussex Police said the cost of policing the protest is already £2.3million and is likely to increase
Expensive: Sussex Police said the cost of policing the protest is already £2.3million and is likely to increase
The Balcombe site boasts a media centre, a legal advice tent (the sign outside reads ‘have fun and keep us busy!’) and three restaurant tents serving vegan cuisine. Yet for all the creature comforts, it was actually staged illegally: Jasiewicz and her cronies set up their marquees, without permission, on the field of Richard Ponsford, a local farmer.
‘We didn’t have permission to move there, but we now have a constructive relationship with the farmer,’ a spokesman told me.
Strangely, when I spoke to Mr Ponsford, whose family have been tenants at the farm for 60 years, he saw things differently. ‘It’s a pain,’ he said. ‘We’re just hoping they go away without causing too much damage and leaving a mess.’
Mr Ponsford first learned that his field was being invaded when a neighbour told him several cars and vans were setting up camp there. After a three-hour stand-off, police advised him it was safer to back down and let them have the field.
Earlier this week, police arrested a demonstrator at a different site north of the main camp for allegedly threatening a landowner who asked him to cease trespassing. Little wonder, perhaps, that many residents of Balcombe are starting to grow weary of the invasion of their rural idyll.
Contradiction: Residents in Balcombe have begun to complain at the actions of the protesters with several urging them to leave
Not wanted: Residents in Balcombe have begun to complain at the actions of the protesters with several urging them to leave
Though polls show that a firm majority — perhaps understandably — are opposed to fracking on their doorstep, growing numbers also appear to be tiring of the chaos. Last week, Alison Stevenson, chairman of the parish council, published an open letter saying that it ‘strongly opposes any actions which may be taken which involve civil trespass and/or illegal acts’.
Anti-fracking posters now compete with a smattering of signs saying: ‘Balcombe is 80 per cent opposed to fracking and 100 per cent opposed to illegal actions.’
One resident, drinking at the Half Moon pub, told me: ‘People are very reluctant to criticise the protesters, or speak publicly in support of fracking, because they feel intimidated.’
Peter Cockburn, a 67-year-old retiree who supports the potential arrival of fracking to Balcombe because, among other things, ‘it might bring jobs to the village’, meanwhile compared the protest site to a third world slum. ‘There are bodies lying everywhere, all this smoke going up — and heaven knows what’s in that — and it looks like some sort of Malaysian kampong [shanty town],’ he said.
The former botanist devoted several years of his career to campaigning to save the rainforest in Borneo. ‘I did plenty to save the planet, thank you, and unlike this lot, I didn’t achieve it by sitting on my arse on a grass verge smoking pot.’


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2401253/Benefits-council-house-non-stop-partying-Its-tough-old-life-fracking-protester.html#ixzz2crgbprzI
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Today's post

Jesus Christ, The Same Yesterday, Today and Forever

I had the privilege to be raised in a Christian Home and had the input of my parents and grandparents into my life, they were ...