Showing posts with label Politics- Green Issues. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Politics- Green Issues. Show all posts

Saturday 24 August 2013

Benefits, a council house and non-stop partying. It's a tough old life being a fracking protester!, from the Daily Mail

  • One organiser said at least half Balcombe protesters are on benefits
  • Philip Lardo, 52, a druid, also has council house in Brighton
  • Police complain site is becoming a 'free festival' after anarchists from Spain, France, Holland and Poland, among others, joined the party
  • Cost of policing operation already £2.3million - likely to end up at £3.7million
  • Majority of local residents oppose fracking, but a growing number are tiring of the chaos

Support: Philip Lardo, pictured in full druid dress, is protesting at the Cuadrilla site in Balcombe but normally lives in a council house in Brighton
Support: Philip Lardo, pictured in full druid dress, is protesting at the Cuadrilla site in Balcombe but normally lives in a council house in Brighton
Each morning, 52-year-old Philip Lardo wakes up, lights a camp fire, parks his backside in a deckchair, and rolls a cigarette.
For most of the past three weeks, he’s been living in a tent by the B2036 in Sussex, where he’s spent days relaxing in the sun, or visiting the local shop to stock up on tobacco, snack food and drinking water.
At meal times, Lardo adjourns to a marquee a few hundred yards away to queue up for the home-cooked food that is served free of charge to residents of the leafy site where his tent is pitched.
‘For lunch today, we had Tuscan bean stew,’ he tells me. ‘They served it with bread and rice. It was pretty tasty, if you like that kind of thing.’
In the evenings, he likes to sit around the fire listening to bongo drums and guitar music, or — if he’s feeling energetic — wander to the local pub, the Half Moon.
It sounds, on the face of it, like an idyllic way to spend August. And, as he relaxes in the sunshine, Lardo looks every inch the happy camper. But he isn’t on what you might call a traditional summer holiday; quite the reverse, in fact. 
For, as the crowds of uniformed police officers circling warily in the distance suggest, we are at what is currently the country’s most high-profile political demonstration. Lardo is one of the several hundred protesters who have taken up residence on grass verges near the pretty commuter village of Balcombe.
They are lobbying against an operation by the energy company Cuadrilla, which has started exploratory drilling several thousand feet beneath the rolling countryside of rural Sussex.
Environmentalists fear the Balcombe site could in future be used for fracking, a controversial extraction technique in which pressurised liquid is pumped deep underground to release oil and gas trapped within shale rock.
They have therefore pledged to remain at the scene until the drilling is stopped.
The demo began quietly last month, when a few dozen concerned locals began picketing the site. They were soon joined by Lardo and other activists from across the country, including designer Dame Vivienne Westwood, and perennial activist and ex-rock wife Bianca Jagger.
The group scored a major victory last Friday when drilling was suspended altogether, on the advice of police, after several hundred new protesters arrived for a pre-planned five-day rally.
The suspension was lifted a few days later. But not before the authorities had been accused of surrendering to ‘mob rule’.
On Monday, on a day of so-called ‘direct action’, more than 30 people were arrested for blocking access to the Cuadrilla site, including the Green Party MP Caroline Lucas, whose plight helped place the demo on the front pages.
Noisy: Demonstrators making their voice heard at the drilling site on Monday
Noisy: Demonstrators making their voice heard at the drilling site on Monday
Since then, police helicopters have buzzed almost constantly in the skies above Balcombe, where more than 400 officers from across the country have been deployed.
Yesterday, Sussex Police said the operation had already cost £2.3 million, and is likely to eventually set the taxpayer back some £3.7 million.
The lanes around the usually picturesque village are now filled with riot vans, and coverage of events has helped spark a national debate about the pros and cons of fracking.
Yet at the centre of this expensive circus lie some pressing, unanswered questions. Who exactly are these well-organised eco-warriors? Where did they really come from? Just who is bankrolling their long-running protest? And have the once supportive villagers of Balcombe started to tire of the noisy activists in their midst?
Lardo makes for an instructive case study. While organisers of the Balcombe protest do much to play up its local roots, he, like most of the colourful demonstrators, has no connection to the village. Instead, Lardo has a council house in Brighton. But for most of the year, this publicly-funded property lies empty, since he chooses to live in the woods of Sussex — as a druid.
Gathering pace: The protest began quietly last month with a few concerned locals but has now become the country's most high-profile political demonstration
Gathering pace: The protest began quietly last month with a few concerned locals but has now become the country's most high-profile political demonstration
The job doesn’t always see him wearing traditional druid’s robes but it does allow him to spend weeks on end at ‘direct action’ protests.
With this in mind, Lardo spent the early months of 2013 on the outskirts of Hove, attempting to prevent the construction of a new bypass. When that protest petered out, he moved to Balcombe.
‘As druids, we revere nature and we revere the Earth,’ he says. ‘It’s where we live. Nature is our birthright. That’s why we try to save it.’ Lardo is, of course, entitled to spend his time as he wishes. But like many of fellow protesters, his activist lifestyle turns out to be entirely funded by the taxpayer.
‘Druids aren’t paid, so I am officially unemployed,’ he says, when I ask about his finances. ‘I happen to sign on. I get roughly £80 a week for that. Then, because I’ve got osteoporosis in my knees, hip and toes, I also get disability of around £100 a month.’
Controversial: The protesters are objecting to the process of fracking - a technique which involves pumping liquid deep underground to release oil and gas
Controversial: The protesters are objecting to the process of fracking - a technique which involves pumping liquid deep underground to release oil and gas
The money is deposited in Lardo’s bank account each week, as he sits in his deckchair. And among residents of the Balcombe protest site, precious few appear to be gainfully employed.
Also camping nearby, for example, is full-time protester Natalie Hynde, the 30-year-old daughter of Pretenders singer Chrissie and The Kinks frontman Ray Davies. She and her unemployed boyfriend Simon ‘Sitting Bull’ Medhurst, a 55-year-old veteran eco-warrior, were arrested on Monday for ‘supergluing’ themselves to the site’s entrance gates.
Rodney Jago, a retiree and resident of Balcombe, says that’s typical of his village’s new residents.
‘One of the organisers told me that at least 50 per cent are on benefits,’ Jago says. ‘He was quite shameless about it; didn’t think it was at all embarrassing. It’s like a free holiday for these people. They wave a placard from time to time, but basically all they do is sit in a deckchair, getting free food, while their kids run wild.’
This week anarchists from Spain, France, Holland and Poland, among others, joined the party. Their presence led police to complain that the village has turned into a ‘free festival’ for professional agitators.
One new arrival, from Malaga, said: ‘I was in London and going back to Europe when I heard about this. I’ve only recently learnt about fracking, but thought this would be fun.’
A group of French squatters, who had been living in a derelict house in Islington, North London, meanwhile said they had now moved to Balcombe because ‘the weather is really good and everyone is friendly’.
So how many of the people at the demo really care about fracking?
It’s hard to tell. But many of those involved in Reclaim the Power, a mysterious organisation whose supporters turned up in vast numbers this week, appear to have little connection with the issue.
In its literature, Reclaim the Power says it’s a coalition of ‘member groups’ that include UK Uncut — lobbyists against David Cameron’s spending cuts — Occupy London, who were behind last year’s anti-capitalist protests at St Paul’s Cathedral, and the Greater London Pensioners Association. Other members include a pro-Labour group called Disabled People Against Cuts, along with officials from the powerful trade unions Unite and the far-Left RMT, which supposedly represents transport workers.
Profile: The arrest of Green Party MP Caroline Lucas at the protest brought it to the front pages
Profile: The arrest of Green Party MP Caroline Lucas at the protest brought it to the front pages
Quite why such outfits should take a strong position (or indeed any position) on fracking, and want to be pulling strings in Balcombe, remains unclear.
Some observers wonder if they are merely ‘piggybacking’ the issue for political reasons. The Tory MP Jacob Rees-Mogg has decried demonstrators as a ‘rent-a-mob’, saying that ‘buses of hooligans’ had come to the village to party and cause trouble.
The most curious organisation behind the protest is surely Fuel Poverty Action, listed in the protest camp’s handbook (yes, it has its own handbook), as one of its major organisers. This group supposedly exists to campaign against high energy prices. But in the U.S., a fracking boom has helped reduce domestic gas prices by about a quarter.
So why does Fuel Poverty Action see fit to lobby against the introduction of the technology in the UK? A Reclaim the Power spokesman will say only that it sees fracking as ‘part of the way that the big six energy companies are exploiting the vulnerable in society’.
From a distance, the camp resembled a poor man’s Glastonbury, with hundreds of tents pitched around a selection of stages and marquees. Up close, the smell of BO mingled with an occasional whiff of marijuana. Residents seemed friendly, though their ranks included at least two undercover reporters.
Placards could be seen supporting gay rights, opposing the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, advertising a pro-migrant demonstration in Calais, and calling for an end to animal testing.
Shameless: When anarchists from elsewhere in Europe began to turn up, police complained the protest was becoming a 'free festival' for professional agitators
Shameless: When anarchists from elsewhere in Europe began to turn up, police complained the protest was becoming a 'free festival' for professional agitators
During the afternoon, I spotted three representatives of the local Labour party, wearing red rosettes and campaigning on site on behalf of Alan Rew, a county council election candidate.
Their presence was surely the height of hypocrisy: Labour is cautiously in favour of the technology.
The identity of the key people at the camp remains somewhat obscure. Reclaim the Power calls itself a ‘horizontal’ protest organisation, meaning it has no official leader.
Its finances are also opaque. Some chemical toilets used by protesters have been funded by Greenpeace. Free vegan meals are being provided by a non-profit organisation called ‘Veggies’. Campers seemed unsure who was funding their smart marquee tents and printed literature.
The group was originally formed by 21 environmental activists who were arrested and prosecuted after occupying West Burton coal-fired power station, in Nottinghamshire, last year.
Several are Oxbridge educated, and hail from highly privileged backgrounds. One, Danielle Paffard, studied at Wadham College, Oxford, while her father, Roger, used to be chief executive of High Street chocolatier Thorntons and stationery giant Staples.
Another is Ewa Jasiewicz, 35, a veteran far-Left activist who is best known for campaigning against the Iraq war and being a leader of the Free Gaza Movement, which in 2011 attempted to send a flotilla of ships laden with provisions to the Gaza Strip. She certainly knows how to organise a protest.
Expensive: Sussex Police said the cost of policing the protest is already £2.3million and is likely to increase
Expensive: Sussex Police said the cost of policing the protest is already £2.3million and is likely to increase
The Balcombe site boasts a media centre, a legal advice tent (the sign outside reads ‘have fun and keep us busy!’) and three restaurant tents serving vegan cuisine. Yet for all the creature comforts, it was actually staged illegally: Jasiewicz and her cronies set up their marquees, without permission, on the field of Richard Ponsford, a local farmer.
‘We didn’t have permission to move there, but we now have a constructive relationship with the farmer,’ a spokesman told me.
Strangely, when I spoke to Mr Ponsford, whose family have been tenants at the farm for 60 years, he saw things differently. ‘It’s a pain,’ he said. ‘We’re just hoping they go away without causing too much damage and leaving a mess.’
Mr Ponsford first learned that his field was being invaded when a neighbour told him several cars and vans were setting up camp there. After a three-hour stand-off, police advised him it was safer to back down and let them have the field.
Earlier this week, police arrested a demonstrator at a different site north of the main camp for allegedly threatening a landowner who asked him to cease trespassing. Little wonder, perhaps, that many residents of Balcombe are starting to grow weary of the invasion of their rural idyll.
Contradiction: Residents in Balcombe have begun to complain at the actions of the protesters with several urging them to leave
Not wanted: Residents in Balcombe have begun to complain at the actions of the protesters with several urging them to leave
Though polls show that a firm majority — perhaps understandably — are opposed to fracking on their doorstep, growing numbers also appear to be tiring of the chaos. Last week, Alison Stevenson, chairman of the parish council, published an open letter saying that it ‘strongly opposes any actions which may be taken which involve civil trespass and/or illegal acts’.
Anti-fracking posters now compete with a smattering of signs saying: ‘Balcombe is 80 per cent opposed to fracking and 100 per cent opposed to illegal actions.’
One resident, drinking at the Half Moon pub, told me: ‘People are very reluctant to criticise the protesters, or speak publicly in support of fracking, because they feel intimidated.’
Peter Cockburn, a 67-year-old retiree who supports the potential arrival of fracking to Balcombe because, among other things, ‘it might bring jobs to the village’, meanwhile compared the protest site to a third world slum. ‘There are bodies lying everywhere, all this smoke going up — and heaven knows what’s in that — and it looks like some sort of Malaysian kampong [shanty town],’ he said.
The former botanist devoted several years of his career to campaigning to save the rainforest in Borneo. ‘I did plenty to save the planet, thank you, and unlike this lot, I didn’t achieve it by sitting on my arse on a grass verge smoking pot.’


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2401253/Benefits-council-house-non-stop-partying-Its-tough-old-life-fracking-protester.html#ixzz2crgbprzI
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Thursday 22 August 2013

Thatcher's spin doctor says fracking protestors want UK to live in 'tepees and wigwams'. Daily Express


ANTI-FRACKING protestors are "blinkered totalitarians" who want "us all to live in their yurts, tepees and wigwams" according to Margaret Thatcher's former spin doctor Bernard Ingham.

Bernad-Ingham-has-severly-criticised-the-anti-fracking-lobbyBernad Ingham has severly criticised the anti-fracking lobby
The problem with anti-fracking fanatics is that, like other zealots, they are blinkered totalitarians.
Bernard Ingham
The 81-year-old has also claimed modern environmentalists are showing "hypocrisy, utter stupidity and exaggeration" over fracking, arguing it has far less impact on the countryside than wind farms.

The former Downing Street Press Secretary made the comments just days after the Green MP Caroline Lucas was among protesters arrested at a site in Balcombe, West Sussex where energy firm Cuadrilla is drilling for oil.

Writing in the Yorkshire Post, Mr Ingham said: "The problem with anti-fracking fanatics is that, like other zealots, they are blinkered totalitarians.

He added: "Fracking for shale gas is merely the latest example of their hypocrisy, utter stupidity and exaggeration."

Mr Ingham, who served as press secretary to Mrs Thatcher for 11 years, argued so-called green energy such as wind and solar power had failed to reduce C02 emissions, and are hampering the British economy.
Anti-fracking, lucas, green, arrestGreen MP Caroline Lucas was arrested during the anti-fracking protests

"So much for the average environmentalist’s tender loving concern for the poor, for the unemployed, for the ability of the nation to compete in the world and for a healthy economy capable of looking after the health and welfare of its citizens," he said

"It seems they want us all to live in their yurts, tepees and wigwams in a sort of glorious, save-the-planet pre-industrial squalour – regardless of our manifest objections. If that is not totalitarianism, I don’t know what is.

"As for stupidity, their entire approach to energy is to plump for everything that does not work and exclude everything that does – coal, gas, oil and especially nuclear power which emits next to no CO2.

"Worse still, their long campaign has captured our limited politicians. The result is that, short of an early shale gas bonanza, we can no longer rely on any government of whatever political complexion to provide secure supplies of energy at affordable cost."
Green Party London Assembly Member Jenny Jones said: “As well as being offensive to local communities concerned about fracking, Mr Ingham’s ill-judged comments show he hasn’t done his homework. 
“The debate isn’t one between proponents of progress on one side and ‘green zealots’ on the other. It’s not totalitarianism to want the Government to invest in clean, renewable energy technologies.  You don’t have to live in a yurt to want to avert dangerous climate change.
“As for exaggerating the risks of fracking, the International Energy Agency – not known for hype – has warned of a range of impacts on local communities, including the potential contamination of groundwater.

“And the effect on fuel bills would be minimal at best. Ofgem and Deutsche Bank both say that the widespread use of UK shale gas is unlikely to bring down prices”
No Dash For Gas, which organised the Balcombe camp, said they would return to Balcombe in the future, calling the campaign a "marathon" not a "sprint".

Protesters believe the drilling could lead to fracking, which they claim imposes environmental risks including water contamination and small earthquakes.

Saturday 6 April 2013

Ordinary Christians in the Hands of the Extra-Ordinary God. Part 4:


Ordinary Christians in the Hands of the Extra-Ordinary God.
Part 4:




I Corinthians 1-12:13, 3:4-11, 3:21 – 23  New Living Translation.

12 Some of you are saying, “I am a follower of Paul.” Others are saying, “I follow Apollos,” or “I follow Peter, [d]” or “I follow only Christ! …… 4 When one of you says, “I am a follower of Paul,” and another says, “I follow Apollos,” aren’t you acting just like people of the world? 5 After all, who is Apollos? Who is Paul? We are only God’s servants through whom you believed the Good News. Each of us did the work the Lord gave us. 6 I planted the seed in your hearts, and Apollos watered it, but it was God who made it grow.  11 for no one can lay any foundation other than the one we already have—Jesus Christ…. 21 So don’t boast about following a particular human leader. For everything belongs to you— 22 whether Paul or Apollos or Peter,[g] or the world, or life and death, or the present and the future. Everything belongs to you, 23 and you belong to Christ, and Christ belongs to God.


When we look at the Church today, what do we see and what do we mean by the word Church ? to some the word Church has a negative effect on the other hand, the word Church has a positive effect, to others Church should be consigned to the past, and it doesn’t have any relevance to them and society both today in the present or indeed tomorrow the future, some think of the word Church and they think of a physical building others think of the New Testament concept of God’s people or a spiritual building.

The Church today is divided into various camps or tribal groups, that more often or not have very little to do with other camps or tribal groups, sometimes different churches can be close to each in terms of a physical distance, but miles apart in so many other ways.   Is the Church somewhere we can go to or is it a body of people that we belong to, and are joined alongside each other to work alongside each other to see the Good News of the Gospel of the Kingdom preached to those without the Good News of Salvation through our Lord and Saviour Jesus.

We are divided into groups or denominations that have more to do with our past, and very little to do with our present or future. We hold onto ways of both doing and being church because of our history and our responsibilities to that history, and the expectancies of others. Sometimes we're divided into seemingly rival tribal groups, because for some our revelation of being and doing church is driven by being the people of God where His Presence dwells, but on the other hand we're divided because of politics and personalties !.The Church is a movement for change and transformation but for many of us The Church has become a monument to our spiritual forefathers who were a movement for change and transformation !.


We follow men and sometimes women, we follow the traditions that were our spiritual forefather’s doctrines and their distinctiveness from other tribal groups and when someone from another tribe says let’s meet together for fellowship and to share together, we say we can't because we’re group a and your group b and our big chief said in 1920 said that we need to avoid group b because your understanding of church and Christianity is different from way he told us to be the church and to be a Christian and therefore you’re wrong, or we do meet together but in a spirit of reluctance and/or a spirit of mistrust, we’ve created theories,  doctrines, theologies and solutions how we’re to be the church and to life our Christian lives and be a Christian Witness, but many of those theories etc belong in the past, and have become hindrances and obstacles for us today.

Many of our tribes or denominations have become tied to the way we did Church, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 or a 100 plus years ago, we look for structure and safety in the past.  We think that the way we do and are the Church is the right or indeed the only way to be do or be Church,  we mistake our history for our present and future and wonder why despite our best efforts, our prayers indeed our prophecies, we’re unfulfilled !

When our Lord Jesus walked the streets of his homeland,  he saw a fig tree and when he looked for fruit he found only leaves Matthew 21:18-20, 18  In the morning, as he was returning to the city, he became hungry. 19  And seeing a fig tree by the wayside, he went to it and found nothing on it but only leaves. And he said to it, “May no fruit ever come from you again!” And the fig tree withered at once. 20 When the disciples saw it, they marvelled, saying, “How did the fig tree wither at once?


I would say that so many of our churches are like that fig tree, yes we have life but it has gone to produce only leaves, instead of producing leaves alongside fruit, indeed later in the same chapter, Jesus spoke about the physical nation of Israel, saying that because they trusted in themselves rather than trusting in the Lord, that had lost the Kingdom of God, Matthew 21:43 43 Therefore I tell you, the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people producing its fruits.

For many of our churches today, we’ve lost the Kingdom of God because we’ve trusted in ourselves, our systems, structures and strategies instead of trusting Him , our Lord and Saviour Jesus,  we’ve just grown leaves not fruit and God has gone and left us, even then we’ve created a theology and/or theory/or solutions around that, see Habakkuk 3:15-18 17 Even though the fig trees have no blossoms, and there are no grapes on the vines; even though the olive crop fails, and the fields lie empty and barren; even though the flocks die in the fields, and the cattle barns are empty, 18 yet I will rejoice in the Lord!    I will be joyful in the God of my salvation!

However there is a message of hope, for those Churches that once proclaimed God’s Message, Haggai 1:6  6 You have planted much but harvest little. You eat but are not satisfied. You drink but are still thirsty. You put on clothes but cannot keep warm. Your wages disappear as though you were putting them in pockets filled with holes! See Haggai 1, our transformation isn’t due to our living in the luxury houses that  are our own tribal groups/denominations/churches but rather our transformation comes through being part of His Church, or the Temple or the House of the Lord. We’ve become consumed that our way of doing and being Church is also the Lord’s way of doing and being Church, but our ways are not his ways of doing and being Church see Isaiah 55:8-11

We have set in place man made structures, systems and organizations to how to do and be the Church today, we set in place committees, clerical systems and called and commissioned those He’s not called and commissioned to lead us in being the Church and we wonder why nothing is working, we’ve watered down and diluted our message to make it pliable to others, we’ve accepted things that go against Biblical Standards like Homosexual Clergy  and wonder why God isn’t moving amongst us and blessing us

Yet, there is hope for us the Church,  the old wineskins of our ways,  those beloved ways of doing and being the Church aren’t working and if we try to add His way of being and doing Church or the new wine to our old wineskins, our old wineskins are going to tear and break up, instead we need His new wineskins of doing and being the Church, his structure, systems, and Leadership* and following those He has called and commissioned to lead us forward, see Luke 5:37-39.

We notice in Scripture, there is a God Ordained indeed Organized way of being and doing Church, no longer will our man made systems cope with the things, our message should be say no, to the status quo,  We don’t need any other or more denominations or tribes, we don’t need another methodology of doing and being the Church.  We need to be a Movement and not a Monument. We need to see a restoration of Apostolic Christianity, which is a Movement for the 21st Century Church not a Monument to the 1st Century Church.  We need to see Revival through a Renewed Church.


It says in Ephesians 4:11-13* 11 Now these are the gifts Christ gave to the church: the apostles, the prophets, the evangelists, and the pastors and teachers. 12 Their responsibility is to equip God’s people to do his work and build up the church, the body of Christ. 13 This will continue until we all come to such unity in our faith and knowledge of God’s Son that we will be mature in the Lord, measuring up to the full and complete standard of Christ.  See Ephesians 4:11-16 for context.

Yours in His Grace

Blair Humphreys

Saturday 2 March 2013

Equal Marriage : Just Plain Wrong: A Christian Perspective on the Gay Marriage Debate in the UK


Equal Marriage : Just Plain Wrong: A Christian Perspective on the Gay Marriage Debate in the UK

Equal Marriage; Just Plain Wrong.

Today, both in the United Kingdom and other Countries, we face the challenge in the name of Equality and Tolerance to allow same sex marriage (the marriage of a man to another man or the marriage of a woman to another woman) the equal standing in society that marriage between a man and a woman or a woman and a man has in the 21st Century.

Yet those calling for Equality and Tolerance, only believe that their view and understanding of Equality and Tolerance is the only valid view and supersedes the understanding of both Equality and Tolerance of those Groups such as Christians that disagree with their view and understanding, rather than an open and honest debate and discussion, they have decided to demonize those who’s views and understanding of Equality and Tolerance differ from theirs, and criticize and condemn them for not showing or agreeing to both Equality and Tolerance, this is indeed a lack of Equality and Tolerance, for by calling those groups who differ from them In-tolerant etc,  they themselves have done  exactly what they accuse other groups of!

In recent days,  I have followed the on-going debate in today’s media both in favour and against same sex marriage and have examined the evidence and have researched the different perspectives and I believe that our standard and indeed our bench mark for all practices that we the Church hold,  is God’s Word  The Bible. It is quite easy to be influenced by the opinions and perspectives of others.

Romans 12:1-2 the Message

1-2 So here's what I want you to do, God helping you: Take your everyday, ordinary life—you’re sleeping, eating, going-to-work, and walking-around life—and place it before God as an offering. Embracing what God does for you is the best thing you can do for him. Don't become so well-adjusted to your culture that you fit into it without even thinking. Instead, fix your attention on God. You'll be changed from the inside out. Readily recognize what he wants from you, and quickly respond to it. Unlike the culture around you, always dragging you down to its level of immaturity, God brings the best out of you, develops well-formed maturity in you.
I’m on Facebook, which I think is one of the best sources of both news and information available on-line and I subscribe to various news feeds . I read with interest and a high level of disappointment and article on Lib Dem Voice by Steve Gilbert is Liberal Democrat MP for St Austell and Newquay.  “Church Opposition to Gay Marriage is intolerant, out of touch and wrong.” 
Mr. Gilbert has quoted that societies in the past such as Ancient China and Ancient Rome allowed Gay Marriage; if we followed the example of these societies today we would still have Slavery and The Death Penalty for various Crimes.  So if we follow the Example of Ancient Rome and all that is involved in that in allowing Gay Marriage shouldn’t we also allow Slavery and turn Wembley Arena into a 21st Century version of the Coliseum at Rome!  I think not!


The Bible clearly teaches that both Homosexual Practice and Behaviour are wrong and therefore calling for Homosexual Marriage doesn’t legitimise a practice or behaviour that God clearly speaks against, if anything Homosexual Marriage waters down the blessings of Marriage.  

-
 To understand why Mr. Gilbert mentioned that practices of Ancient Rome and Ancient China, I decided to examine the evidence and have discovered the following on Wikipedia. (Although Wikipedia is not infallible)

“Various types of same-sex marriages have existed, [52] ranging from informal, unsanctioned relationships to highly ritualized unions.[53]
In the southern Chinese province of Fijian, through the Ming dynasty period, females would bind themselves in contracts to younger females in elaborate ceremonies.[54] Males also entered similar arrangements. This type of arrangement was also similar in ancient European history.[55]
An example of egalitarian male domestic partnership from the early Zhou Dynasty period of China is recorded in the story of Pan Zhang & Wang Zhongxian. While the relationship was clearly approved by the wider community, and was compared to heterosexual marriage, it did not involve a religious ceremony binding the couple.[56]
The first historical mention of the performance of same-sex marriages occurred during the early Roman Empire.[57] For instance, Emperor is reported to have engaged in a marriage ceremony with one of his male slaves. Emperor Elagabalus "married" a Carianslave named Hierocles.[58] It should be noted, however, that conubium existed only between a civis Romanus and a civis Romana (that is, between a male Roman citizen and a female Roman citizen), so that a so-called marriage between two Roman males (or with a slave) would have no legal standing in Roman law (apart, presumably, from the arbitrary will of the emperor in the two aforementioned cases).[59] Furthermore, "matrimonium is an institution involving a mother, mater. The idea implicit in the word is that a man takes a woman in marriage, in matrimonium ducere, so that he may have children by her."[60] Still, the lack of legal validity notwithstanding, there is a consensus among modern historians that same-sex relationships existed in ancient Rome, but the exact frequency and nature of "same-sex unions" during that period is obscure.[61] In 342 AD Christian emperors Constantius II and Constans issued a law in the Theodosian Code (C. Th. 9.7.3) prohibiting same-sex marriage in Rome and ordering execution for those so married.[62]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay_marriage

So using the example that same sex marriage was common both in Ancient China and Ancient Rome and had the same legal standing that marriage between a Man and a Woman is not valid and indeed erroneous.

I said earlier that our understanding of issues and our bench mark for all practices should God’s Word the Bible, for example if The Bible supported the idea that the Marriage Union between a Man and a Man and a Woman and Woman was equal to the Marriage Union between a Man and a Woman it would say so, in the Bible there is only one definition of Marriage and that is between a Man and a Woman or a Woman and a Man.  So if we believe that the Bible is God’s Inspired Word we Christians shouldn’t support or agree to a Marriage Ceremony or Union that doesn’t involve a Man marrying a Woman or a Vice a Versa, lets us examine some scriptures on Marriage.

All Scripture Verses are from the English Stand Version unless otherwise stated.

Genesis 2:20b-24
But for Adam[g] there was not found a helper fit for him.21 so the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man, and while he slept took one of his ribs and closed up its place with flesh. 22 And the rib that the Lord God had taken from the man he made[h] into a woman and brought her to the man. 23 Then the man said,
“This at last is bone of my bones
    and flesh of my flesh;
she shall be called Woman,    because she was taken out of Man.”[i]
24 Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh.

Jeremiah 29:6
 6 Take wives and have sons and daughters; take wives for your sons, and give your daughters in marriage, that they may bear sons and daughters; multiply there, and do not decrease.

1 Corinthians 7:2B
, each man should have his own wife and each woman her own husband.

Ephesians 5:31-33
31 “Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.” 32 This mystery is profound, and I am saying that it refers to Christ and the church. 33 However, let each one of you love his wife as himself, and let the wife see that she respects her husband.

There are of course many scriptures referring to the marriage between a Man and a Woman, which space wouldn’t allow me to add, I’m sure that the above scriptures will serve as a start to your own personal study.

Further Reading:
1.     Will Churches be forced to conduct Gay Marriage?
2.     The Archbishop of York says don't force through Gay Marriage
3.     78% of the British Public say don't force through Gay Marriage
4.     The Christian Institute
5.     Christian Concern
6.     The Coalition for Marriage

Tuesday 11 September 2007

Whatever next, " A tax to park at Tesco ?."



I used to believe that the Tory Party, were the party of low or lower taxation, unfortunately this is no longer true, due to their proposals to introduce "Green or Environmental friendly, Taxation."






I'm generally apolitical, although I hold strong and long held opinions, basically if the Tory Party win the next General Election, we could see a reduction in general taxation, IE Income Tax and National Insurance Contributions, on the other hand we could see a eye watering increase in "stealth tax's " although in fairness, the Tory Party have said the Green Tax's will fund a reduction in General Taxation, this may be true, but it could be the case we could be paying more taxation under a Cameron Government than a Brown Government.

Now Tories want us to pay for parking at the supermarket by JANE MERRICK - Last updated at 08:52am on 11th September 2007
Free parking at supermarkets, garden centres and DIY stores would be scrapped under a Conservative plan to tax pollution. David Cameron says the move would encourage families to use small shops on the high street and curb the growing power of food giants. The Tories claim it would also help the environment because shoppers would ditch their car and use public transport.

Read More at the Daily Mail:-

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=481113&in_page_id=1770

Also please read a quote from the Daily Mail Columnist Richard Littlejohn's comments on the Tory's Taxation Plans:-

"The "climate change" hysteria has proved a godsend for prodnoses and punishment freaks. I doubt there is a single country on earth where the entire political class has so completely taken leave of its senses over alleged global warming. Here in Britain, it has been seized upon as an exciting new weapon with which to inflict more taxes, fines and regulations on us. "

Read More:-

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/columnists/columnists.html?in_article_id=481067&in_page_id=1772&in_author_id=322&in_check=N

Today's post

Jesus Christ, The Same Yesterday, Today and Forever

I had the privilege to be raised in a Christian Home and had the input of my parents and grandparents into my life, they were ...