Monday, 11 August 2014
Spectator: If Scots Vote NO, Blame Alex Salmond.
Spectator: If Scots Vote NO, Blame Alex Salmond.: There were numerous critics, many of them quite vociferous, of the early part of the opening ceremony of the Commonwealth Games, which was l...
Operation Sealion by Leo McKinstry: A new look at why the Nazis didn't invade Britain, Daily Express
THE
Daily Express columnist argues that British ruthlessness, political nous and an
uncompromising spirit forced Hitler to dither and finally fail in his planned
invasion
England
faced one of its tensest ever periods in the summer of 1940. Much of Europe had
fallen to Hitler, and it was believed that invasion by the Nazis was imminent.
While
Churchill was a popular figure as Prime Minister, there had been several
difficult periods, not least the near-annihilation of the British Expeditionary
Force at Dunkirk and the loss of virtually all of their equipment.
By
rights, Britain should have been invaded and conquered as its neighbours were
and German plans were drawn up for such an assault, codenamed Operation
Sealion. And yet, standing alone against the German threat, it remained
impregnable, and Operation Sealion never took place. Why was this?
In
his immaculately researched and gripping work, Leo McKinstry paints a vivid
picture of what was happening in England. After the outbreak of hostilities the
previous year, an uneasy state of tension had existed, namely the so-called
“Phoney War”, in which the country sat ready for action but nothing seemed to
happen. All the while, Hitler planned his campaign.
Crisis in Iraq - five things you can ACTUALLY do to help, Published 08 August 2014 | Martin Saunders Christianity Today
A
few weeks ago, I changed my social media profile photo. Like many others, I was
responding to the awful situation in Mosul, Iraq, where my fellow Christians
are reportedly being forced to convert to Islam, or otherwise being threatened
with execution. It was a vague attempt to do something - anything - to help. I
was standing in solidarity, if nothing else, and hopefully encouraging others
to do the same.
The
trouble of standing in solidarity however, is that when it's done from being a
laptop screen in a cosy branch of Costa Coffee, it achieves pretty much
nothing.
Fast
forward a few weeks, and the situation is worse than ever. I don't need to
recount here the horrible stories of forced conversions, people starving up
mountains and beheaded children.
Here's
the thing: we can't stand by while this happens. We just can't. If we call
ourselves Christians - or even just human beings - we have to care enough to
put down whatever we're doing and take a few minutes to engage.
So
what, practically, can we do? I've spent a little while thinking, praying and
asking others about that question, and here is a start.
Further
Reading
Brian Monteith: Rushing towards fiscal uncertainty, The Scotsman
IT’S
difficult to trust Salmond’s economic judgment after his previous
prevarications and u-turns, writes Brian Monteith
WHILE
pundits and spin doctors seek to suggest who won the first referendum debate
between Alex Salmond and Alistair Darling, what is self-evident is that the
debate helped to distil the question down to one single issue. In the event
that Alex Salmond cannot get the currency option of his choice (a formal
currency union using sterling) what is his Plan B? The answer, there was none.
As
we hurtle at break-neck speed to the vote on 18 September I am sure we can
expect more of the same; the personal but small distractions will be tossed
aside and we shall focus more on what for the majority of us are the big
issues. Such as what will be the new more expensive price for Scotland
remaining a member of the European Union, or how will Scotland pay for the cost
of its pension liabilities when our workforce will be shrinking and our pension
bill rising (before even considering Nicola Sturgeon’s promise of a lower
pensionable age in some parallel universe that only she inhabits).
There
may be others, such as the pick-and-mix sweetie shop of freebies and goodies
that nationalists have been dreaming up to be paid for by the munificence of
oil revenues – while at the same time telling us we can have a sovereign oil
fund that by implication requires a more austere approach to public welfare.
We
shall see what matters most, but for all that, the one crucial issue that Scots
residents (as opposed to the broader body of Scots that would more usually have
a say in the future of their country) are already well tuned into is how our
economy might or might not work if we secede from the United Kingdom and choose
the SNP’s offer of independence without independence. (For those of you not
used to reading my column let me recap that there will be no referendum on the
new price of EU membership and its tighter straightjacket, there will be less
influence than present with any formal currency union and even less still with
any unofficial use of sterling, while many other institutions that we shall
seek to keep access to such as the BBC we shall have no say in).
Further
reading:
“An independent Scotland would keep the pound because it’s our currency
and it would be in the interests of the rest of the UK to agree to currency
sharing. But if the rest of the UK won’t agree, an independent Scotland would
punish it by repudiating its pro rata share of UK debt…..Yes, it would remove a hefty burden from our shoulders. But an
independent country that began life with debt repudiation would find it could
not raise money in international markets without lenders demanding
substantially higher interest rates. Scotland’s
credit rating would be rock bottom.”
This Experience Must Come, My Uttermost for His Highest, Daily Devotionals Oswald Chambers

Elijah
went up by a whirlwind into heaven. And Elisha . . . saw him no more —2 Kings
2:11-12
It
is not wrong for you to depend on your “Elijah” for as long as God gives him to
you. But remember that the time will come when he must leave and will no longer
be your guide and your leader, because God does not intend for him to stay.
Even the thought of that causes you to say, “I cannot continue without my
’Elijah.’ ” Yet God says you must continue.
Alone
at Your “Jordan” (2 Kings 2:14). The Jordan River represents the type of
separation where you have no fellowship with anyone else, and where no one else
can take your responsibility from you. You now have to put to the test what you
learned when you were with your “Elijah.” You have been to the Jordan over and
over again with Elijah, but now you are facing it alone. There is no use in
saying that you cannot go— the experience is here, and you must go. If you
truly want to know whether or not God is the God your faith believes Him to be,
then go through your “Jordan” alone.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
Today's post
Jesus Christ, The Same Yesterday, Today and Forever
I had the privilege to be raised in a Christian Home and had the input of my parents and grandparents into my life, they were ...
-
Recently, I have found that I have a lot of free time, due to circumstances, although I have been spending time with some ...
-
Living a Life without Limits. I’m going to ask you to think about this question and I would like you to pray abou...