Showing posts with label Financial Problems. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Financial Problems. Show all posts

Sunday 5 January 2014

Exposed: Bulgarian fixers tell new arrivals to UK... We will fake documents so you can claim benefits


  • MoS reporter posing as newly arrived Bulgarian offered illegal papers
  • Follows relax of benefit restrictions on New Year's Day for migrants

Eastern European migrants are being offered expert help to fraudulently milk the benefits system by an accountants agency run by a Bulgarian businessman, a Mail on Sunday undercover investigation has revealed.
Our reporter, posing as a newly arrived Bulgarian migrant seeking to claim benefits, was filmed being illegally offered bogus documents to support her application by an ‘advice’ agency in North London yesterday.
The news comes as work and benefit restrictions were relaxed by the Government on New Year’s Day for migrants from the EU’s two poorest nations, Bulgaria and Romania.
Galia, left, and Nina at Premium Advice 4 U Ltd in Wood Green, North London speaking to our undercover reporter
Galia, left, and Nina at Premium Advice 4 U Ltd in Wood Green, North London speaking to our undercover reporter
Our investigator, Maria, a 25-year-old Bulgarian graduate living in London, told the company – Premium Advice 4 U (PA4U) in Wood Green – that she had been in this country for two months, working cash-in-hand as a cleaner without paying tax or National Insurance, but now wanted to see what benefits she could claim.
Two women employees, Galia and Nina, spoke to her for around 45 minutes and much of their advice was legal and correct. 
But they also told her they could draw up bogus paperwork, falsely stating she had cleaned both their houses to back up a housing benefit claim.
 
PA4U, wedged between a shop with a hand-painted sign reading ‘Houses cleared’ and an accountancy firm, charges £20 for an hour-long consultation and its quarter-page advert  in London-based Bulgarian-language newspaper, BG Ben, claims that it can help with ‘any type  of benefits’.
The sole director of the company, which was registered in October last year, is 37-year-old Bulgarian Hristo Trifonov. He also runs a firm called Right Cleaners Limited, which changed its name from Safetrans Logistic Ltd in June last year and lists its activities as ‘freight transport by road’.
Change: Romanian migrants arriving at Luton Airport on the first day since the lifting of travel restrictions
Change: Romanian migrants arriving at Luton Airport on the first day since the lifting of travel restrictions
When The Mail on Sunday contacted the company, a man who called himself Ilian said he offered face-to-face consultations on benefits for £20, plus additional charges for extra services.
These include a £50 ‘registration fee’, £20 for help applying for a National Insurance number, £60 to register as self-employed, and £60 to prepare a tax return. 
PA4U also claims to provide help and advice with bank accounts, opening a limited company, arranging car insurance, MoTs, and exchanging a Bulgarian driving licence for a UK version. 
There is no suggestion that any of these activities involve any improper activity.
At yesterday’s consultation, the first woman, Galia, advised Maria that if she wanted to claim housing benefit she would need a National Insurance number. 
But, as a self-employed person, she would have to submit work records and references along with her application to prove her past income. 
Galia even suggested she and her colleague Nina would be prepared to lie in writing to benefits officers, stating that their own homes had been cleaned by our reporter.
The true cost of our open borders: The Mail on Sunday story last week
The true cost of our open borders: The Mail on Sunday story last week
Galia explained that Maria would need ‘contracts with clients, references from clients. If you do not have them, we can help you.
‘We can give you references and if they [the authorities] call, they will call us to confirm.’
When Maria asked whether the arrangement was legal, Galia assured her it was.
To apply for housing benefit from a local authority, claimants must fill in a 40-page form giving details of their income and outgoings, including rent. 
Crucially, for self-employed people who have not been in business long, they must provide a ‘summary of their trading records’ plus copies of invoices and payments.
When approached by The Mail on Sunday last night, Mr Trifonov said: ‘We did not offer to prepare bogus documents to support a housing benefit application.
‘We suggested that if she needed help with references to apply for National insurance number, she could clean our houses and we can confirm that she has done so.’
Another firm in Wood Green, called Alex Developments Ltd, also gives advice about benefits, tax and National Insurance, but its staff did not suggest anything improper or illegal. 
When Maria asked Bulgarian-born director Stroumen Paounov, 48, about claiming the Jobseeker’s Allowance while working, he replied: ‘I wouldn’t advise it because you will get caught.’
He charged £40 for an hour’s consultation in which he explained how to claim housing benefit, register for National Insurance, and he also offered help filling out the forms at the same hourly rate.
Immigration pressure group Migration Watch UK has warned that a total of 250,000 migrants from the two countries are likely to travel to Britain in the next five years, increasing pressure on the Health Service and schools.
The Government has banned Romanians and Bulgarians from claiming out-of-work benefits for the next three months, but Migration Watch forecasts that in-work benefits such as housing benefit and tax credits for low-paid workers will lure many of Romanians and Bulgarians currently working in Spain and Italy, as British handouts are significantly more generous.
Migration Watch’s figures claim that single migrants from Romania and Bulgaria can earn five times more in the UK than at home, a wage topped up by the UK’s generous tax credits system.
  • Additional reporting: Nick Craven


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2533889/Exposed-Bulgarian-fixers-tell-new-arrivals-UK-We-fake-documents-claim-benefits.html#ixzz2pVVPbVHN
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Friday 3 January 2014

Scottish independence would be economic disaster, finance experts warn just as the SNP say the economy is key battleground , Daily Mail


  • Businesses and academics warn country would be plunged into turmoil
  • Scotland would join the list of impoverished European countries
  • Another says there would be 'utter panic' if voters back independence 

Finance experts, academics and business leaders have raised fears that independence would destroy the economy, hit investment and force companies to migrate to England.
In an unprecedented survey that will prove devastating for the SNP, analysts believe a Yes vote in the referendum could lead to the loss of thousands of jobs and plunge the country into turmoil.
One finance insider suggested Scotland would be added to the list of impoverished European countries left on their knees. Another said there would be 'utter panic' among finance firms and several warned of a 'disaster' for Scotland.
Setback: The vision of independence set out by Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon risks the Scottish economy and would see businesses flee to England, experts warn
Setback: The vision of independence set out by Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon risks the Scottish economy and would see businesses flee to England, experts warn
Alex Salmond's separatist vision was dismissed as 'economically incoherent'; there were warnings that 'skilled labour' would leave; and creating a new border would cut gross domestic product (GDP) by as much as 3 per cent. 
The findings are particularly humiliating for Deputy First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, who yesterday predicted the economy would be the key battleground in the referendum campaign.
The Financial Times asked a number of high-profile economists and eminent university professors to examine the impact of a Nationalist victory in September. 
 
In a daunting verdict, 27 respondents said it would hurt the Scottish economy and the rest of the UK.
Only four people who took part in the survey said a Yes vote could have a positive impact.
Former Chancellor Alistair Darling, who is leading the pro-Union Better Together campaign, said the findings prove that the 'risks involved in leaving the UK are massive'.
But a spokesman for the Yes Scotland campaign insisted separation would 'encourage growth and increase employment'.
Referendum: Voters in Scotland will have their saying on leaving the UK this autumn
Referendum: Voters in Scotland will have their saying on leaving the UK this autumn

FARMERS WANT TO STAY IN UK

Farmers in Scotland are set to reject independence, a survey suggests
Farmers are overwhelmingly set to reject independence, according to a survey. 
Scots Lib Dem MEP George Lyon received 2,000 replies to a study he conducted, with 72 per cent of respondents supporting the Union.
Three-quarters of farmers expressed concern about the impact separation could have on EU agricultural subsidies.
Four-fifths said uncertainty over currency would harm their businesses, while 72 per cent feared separation would make it difficult to sell produce in the rest of the UK.
Mr Lyon said: 'Everyone wants to see a thriving Scottish rural economy, but if you look at the real positives we get from the UK market, from our place in Europe and our trade links overseas, our farmers can achieve more as part of the UK family.
'Scotland's place in the EU is not only vital for farmers, but also for jobs and growth.' But Rural Affairs Secretary Richard Lochhead has claimed farmers would have been handed an extra £1billion in European subsidies if Scotland were separate.
Philip Rush of Japanese finance giant Nomura launched a stinging attack on the SNP vision. 'Higher taxes on income would push many wealthy individuals and some companies they work for south of the Border, harming Scotland's economy,' he said. 'A fate similar to the secular stagnation in productivity seen in parts of Europe's socialist south may await.' 
Ruth Porter of the Policy Exchange think-tank was similarly dismissive, saying: 'The raft of economically incoherent policies being proposed by Alex Salmond would be disastrous for Scotland.' Gavyn Davies of Fulcrum Asset Management described a Yes vote as an 'unmitigated disaster for Scotland' as did Stephen King, chief economist at HSBC bank.
One of the main results of an SNP victory in the referendum would be the loss of companies - and jobs - to England, several experts said.
Keith Wade, chief economist of asset management firm Schroders, commented: 'When combined with the considerable uncertainty over whether Scotland can remain in the EU, Scottish business would start to head south.' 
David Owen, chief European financial economist with investment firm Jeffries, said: 'Scotland is likely to see an ongoing loss of business as it migrates south of the Border.' 
Andrew Hilton of the Centre for the Study of Financial Innovation warned: 'If there were a Yes vote there would be utter panic - with the Scottish fund managers heading for the Border in droves.' 
Neville Hill of Credit Suisse bank said: 'The flow of direct and portfolio investment, as well as some bank deposits, south of the Border would provide Scotland with a nasty negative monetary shock.' 
Many of those taking part in the survey said uncertainty would devastate the economy.
James Knightley of banking giant ING said: 'I think the uncertainty will be damaging for everyone ... it is going to make a lot of foreign companies think twice about investing in the UK.' 
Melanie Baker of Morgan Stanley warned of 'increased uncertainty for businesses and markets'.
Brian Hilliard of French banker Société Générale said: 'It would create major uncertainty about the viability of the country as an economic unit. Growth would be hurt.' 
Ray Barrell of Brunel University in London warned that independence 'is the introduction of a new border. That is likely to reduce Scottish GDP by 3 per cent, and English GDP by 1 per cent'.
Alistair Darling, leading the Better Together campaign against independence, said the findings prove that the 'risks involved in leaving the UK are massive'
Alistair Darling, leading the Better Together campaign against independence, said the findings prove that the 'risks involved in leaving the UK are massive'
An independent Scotland's reliance on oil was also highlighted, with Philip Shaw of financier Investec predicting 'overall it will be on a slow growth path'.
But despite the strong warnings Miss Sturgeon said yesterday: ‘I firmly believe who wins the economic argument will win the referendum.
‘Scotland can more than afford to be independent, something that even the No campaign agrees with. We need the powers over the economy to get faster and more sustainable growth into the economy for the long term.’
A spokesman for Yes Scotland added: ‘The greatest uncertainty for business as well as the country as a whole stems from a ‘No’ vote. With ‘Yes’, we can tailor policies to suit our own needs and priorities, thereby encouraging growth and increasing employment.’


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2533222/Scottish-independence-economic-disaster-finance-experts-warn-just-SNP-say-economy-key-battleground.html#ixzz2pMyug9zO
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Saturday 28 December 2013

This worryingly crowded isle: England is officially Europe's most densely packed country, Daily Mail Story

This worryingly crowded isle: England is officially Europe's most densely packed country

  • England has overtaken the Netherlands and is second only to tiny Malta 
  • Over the next 30 years the gap is expected to widen even more
  • Figures show the huge impact of Labour’s open-door immigration policy
England has become the most overcrowded major country in Europe.
Population growth is so rapid that four times as many people will soon be crammed in as France and twice as many as Germany.
England has overtaken the Netherlands to become second only to tiny Malta as the most densely populated nation in the EU. 
England has overtaken the Netherlands to become the most densely populated major nation in the EU
Squeeze: England has overtaken the Netherlands to become the most densely populated major nation in the EU
Over the next 30 years the gap will widen because Germany, France and Holland will either decline or grow only slowly.
 
The House of Commons figures – based on data from the UK and EU statistical agencies – show the huge impact of Labour’s open-door immigration policy.
By 2046, an estimated 494 people will be squeezed into every square kilometre of England compared with 411 now and only 374 when Tony Blair took power in 1997.
Lax controls: The figures ¿ based on data from the UK and EU statistical agencies ¿ show the huge impact of Labour's open-door immigration policy
Lax controls: The figures - based on data from the UK and EU statistical agencies - show the huge impact of Labour's open-door immigration policy
The revelations will fuel the debate over immigration, especially with the UK opening its borders to Romanian and Bulgarian workers on New Year’s Day.
James Clappison, the Tory MP who obtained the figures, said: ‘Under the last Labour government, England’s green and pleasant land became England’s green and crowded land.

ENGLAND FEELS THE SQUEEZE

Number of people expected to be living per square kilometre in 2015 - by country
  • England - 419
  • Holland  - 408
  • Wales - 258 
  • Germany - 226 
  • Italy - 205 
  • N. Ireland - 130
  • Poland - 123
  • Portugal - 116
  • France - 105 
  • Romania - 89  
  • Bulgaria - 66
  • Scotland - 40
‘For reasons which have never been properly explained, Labour instigated a policy of massive expansion of immigration.
The fear must be a future Labour government would do the same’. Sir Andrew Green, chairman of the Migrationwatch think-tank, said 90 per cent of immigrants to the UK headed to England.
‘The rapidly growing population density is an inevitable consequence of Labour’s mass immigration of nearly four million in 13 years,’ he added.
‘We already see the pressure on maternity units and primary schools. Less visible is the pressure on housing, which is already in crisis.
‘We will need to build 200 houses a day for the next 20 years or so simply for new immigrants and their families.’
The House of Commons report says the number of people living in every square kilometre in England will rise from 411 now to 419 in 2015, to 433 in 2020 and to 460 in 2030.
By 2046, an astonishing 494 people will be living in each square kilometre.
The equivalent figure for France will be just 115, for Germany 204 and the Netherlands 421.
By 2015, England will also be more than three times more packed than Poland – where an estimated one million of the arrivals under Labour originated from.
The research raises concerns about how the UK’s infrastructure can cope with the increased pressure on schools, hospitals and roads.
Business secretary Vince Cable
Prime Minister David Cameron
Clash: Liberal Democrat Business Secretary Vince Cable, left, likened David Cameron's policies to Enoch Powell’s notorious 1960s ‘rivers of blood’ speech
The large numbers packed into the country will also affect water and power supplies, and will increase pressure to build over green spaces.
David Cameron, under pressure to confront the electoral threat posed by UKIP, has changed the law to prevent EU migrants claiming any benefits in the first three months following arrival. 

DAILY MAIL COMMENT

In the wake of the open door immigration policies deliberately pursued by New Labour, England  is now the most crowded country  in Europe.
By 2015, there will be twice as many people crammed into every square kilometre as in Germany, and four times more than in France.
Only three decades from now, unless there is a significant tightening in border controls, there will be almost 495 people living in each square kilometre – compared to only 374 when Labour came to power in 1997.
Vince Cable and his colleagues  on the Left disgracefully suggest  that it is somehow racist to worry about immigration.
As our revelations show, it has nothing to do with race – and everything to do with how schools, social services, the NHS and housing can possibly be expected to cope with such unprecedented pressure.
Officials say they want to reduce the ‘pull factor’ to the UK.
Last weekend, tensions between the two Coalition government parties boiled over when Liberal Democrat Business Secretary Vince Cable likened Tory policies to Enoch Powell’s notorious 1960s ‘rivers of blood’ speech.
The Office for National Statistics has already warned that Britain must make room for almost 10million more people over the next 25 years – the equivalent of building a city even larger than London.
The increase, mainly a result of immigration and high migrant birthrates, will push numbers to 73.3million by 2037. 
A Home Office spokesman said: ‘Immigration has brought benefits to the UK and we welcome people who want to come here to contribute to our economy and society.
‘However, it is important to control immigration because of its effect on social cohesion, our public services, and on jobs and wages.’
The figures for the rest of the UK in 2015 are predicted to be: Scotland 40 per square kilometre, Wales 258 and Northern Ireland 131. Malta’s figure is expected to be 1,308.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2530125/This-worryingly-crowded-isle-England-officially-Europes-densely-packed-country.html#ixzz2okvhb5FZ
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Sunday 25 August 2013

The Money Shop's owner Dollar Financial says tough new curbs for payday lenders could cost it up to £10m a year By NEIL CRAVEN, FINANCIAL MAIL ON SUNDAY

The Money Shop's owner Dollar Financial says tough new curbs for payday lenders could cost it up to £10m a year

Britain’s second largest payday lender says that years of soaring growth have ended after an overhaul of the market by the Office of Fair Trading. 
US-based Dollar Financial, which owns The Money Shop and internet lenders Payday UK and Payday Express, said turnover from online lending in Britain fell 2.9 per cent in the three months to the end of June. That compares with a rise of 34 per cent in the same period in 2012. 
The lender told investors that tighter controls will cost it up to £10million a year. It said that the halt in growth had come from tighter limits on who can borrow and for how long. 
Tighter controls: The Money Shop's owner, Dollar Financial, says new rules cost it £10m
Tighter controls: The Money Shop's owner, Dollar Financial, says new rules cost it £10m
The number of times customers can roll over loans into larger debts has been limited to three. However, Dollar Financial also told investors in a conference call that the drop had been compounded by aggressive marketing from rivals. 
Executives said that such rivals were among those expected to pull out of the market, but in the meantime were trying to grow the size of their loan book ‘in an effort to acquire as many customers as they can before the Sword of Damocles falls on them’. 
 
Dollar Financial’s British operations are second only to Wonga in size. Cash America, which operates QuickQuid and Pounds to Pocket, is the third largest. 
The Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, has been one of the fiercest critics of payday lenders, describing their interest rates as ‘usury’. 
The OFT has referred the entire payday lending market to the Competition Commission, as first revealed by The Mail on Sunday in June. 
The investigation by the OFT has already forced 20 of the top 50 lenders to quit the market or wind down their businesses. 
However, Dollar Financial executives predicted that more lenders would drop out of the market and it could recover next year. 
They said tighter controls on payday lending will make it ‘inconceivable’ that smaller operators will be able to operate legally in the UK. 
Chairman and chief executive Jeffrey Weiss said: ‘We think many of the other operators, including some of the larger ones, will struggle with the necessary implementation and self-monitoring activities.
‘That is why we are confident that we will emerge from this process with a significantly stronger position.’


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/money/news/article-2401367/Money-Shop-owner-Dollar-Financial-admits-new-curbs-payday-lenders-hurting.html#ixzz2d0kustzP
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

The secret plane stuffed full of cash that saved the euro: When Greece burned and its banks melted, the EU talked tough and threatened to cut it loose... but covertly flooded it with 10 Billion Euros


  • The European bank Troika boosted Greek banks through secret flights
  • Billions of euros were flown to Greece and Cyprus to save the currency

To the casual observer there was nothing odd or even surprising in the sight of cargo planes lumbering east over the Adriatic or occasionally skimming southwards over the Alps towards the Balkans and beyond to Greece.
Some of these aircraft, giant  Boeings, bore the distinctive livery of Maersk, the international carriers. Others, smaller, more discreet, were painted in the pale blue and white of the Greek military.
Had anyone bothered to pay attention, or even note down the serial numbers – such as the plane marked OY-SRH seen landing in Cyprus earlier this year – surely they would not have guessed at the purpose of these journeys or their extraordinary cargo.
Rescue mission: Maersk flights to Athens and Larnaca carried billions-worth of euros on each flight to save the Greek economy
Rescue mission: Maersk flights to Athens and Larnaca carried billions-worth of euros on each flight to save the Greek - and the eurozone - economy
Because the flights to Athens and Larnaca that began in 2011 were nothing short of a secret airlift.
The mission was neither to save lives nor even to preserve a fragile democratic freedom like the famous airlifts in post-war Berlin, but to protect and prolong the  economic experiment of a multi-national currency. Billions in freshly minted euro notes made a clandestine journey to struggling Greece – a drama worthy of a John Le Carré novel but authored in Frankfurt am Main, known as Mainhattan, world headquarters of the euro.
 
It was well known that Greece was running out of cash, in metaphorical terms at least. In June 2011, after months of stalling on its economic reform programme, the foreign Troika that effectively controlled the country had run out of patience.
Consisting of the European Union, the European Central Bank and  the International Monetary Fund, the Troika made it clear that it would withhold the final instalment of a €110 billion bailout, agreed in May 2010. This last €12 billion payment of foreign funds was needed desperately – to pay pensions,  public servants and interest on Greece’s huge debts. It was funding that Greece could raise neither in taxes from its own people, nor from the financial markets.
But what most people did not know was that Greece was running out of cash quite literally, too.
There were shortages of all denominations apart from the €10 note. Greeks had responded to the Troika’s threat to pull the €12 billion payment by withdrawing euros from their bank accounts at a record rate.
On the brink: Protesters clash with riot police in Athens, Greece, as its government was teetering on the edge of collapse over the austerity measures
On the brink: Protesters clash with riot police in Athens, Greece, as its government was teetering on the edge of collapse over the austerity measures
Soon there would be not enough euro notes in the country to cope with the number of Greeks trying to get their hands on their money from cash machines and banks. And so a secret plan was activated.  ‘We’re talking about June 2011,’ a senior official overseeing Greece’s bailout told me. ‘Greeks were taking about one to two billion euros a day from the banking system. The Greeks had to send military planes to Italy to get banknotes. It got to that point.’
A decade after it gave up the drachma, the world’s oldest existing currency, Greece faced the crushing reality that it did not have the sovereign authority to meet the demand for paper currency from its own citizens.
It could mint euro coins and there were also plates for the €10 note. But coins and small denomination paper were not going to satisfy the demand.
Only the German Bundesbank, the National Bank of Austria and the Luxembourgers have ever had the plates for the highly prized €500 note, the highest-value paper currency in the world. (This form of manufacturing would appear to have been confined to German-speaking countries.)
Intentionally or not, the ability of Greece to meet a huge surge in demand for banknotes had been effectively proscribed.
By June 2012, Greek demand for paper currency had nearly trebled and amid last summer’s electoral tumult, the secret missions started in 2011 were once again required.
The response was extraordinary. While issuing public threats to Greeks, in private the Troika authorised military and commercial cargo planes to feed them euros – billions-worth on every flight. They were intended not only to preserve Greece’s fracturing social stability, but also to preserve the single currency itself.
Greece’s European partners were worried, and  no wonder. The Governor of the Bank of Greece, George Provopoulos, subsequently explained that  if the demand for notes had not been met, an impression would have been created that the banks were unable to repay depositors.
‘It would have caused a collapse of confidence with dire consequences for financial stability and the general outlook of the country,’ he said.
A Northern Rock-style bank run in Greece could have spread quickly across the Mediterranean – investor concern had already spread to Italy.
A Troika figure told me: ‘There would have been complete and immediate panic. They had no time.
A billion, two billion per day  in banknotes is a lot of money. This then becomes an industrial problem.’
The airlift was only the first stage of the mission. Scores, if not hundreds, of journeys by truck and boat spread the new notes  across the mainland and  the Greek islands, from Rhodes to Corfu, from Crete to Komotini. Staff worked through the night to ensure that bank branches across Greece had sufficient notes to meet depositor demand, and contain any incipient bank run.
Incredibly, this operation proceeded without anyone noticing. The Bank of Greece tracked demand for paper money through bank branch orders. It did not have to deploy teams of ‘bank-run spotters’ as the Bank of England did in the crisis of 2008.
As far as ordinary Greeks were  concerned, the cash machines continued to function. However, underneath their very noses a monetary revolution was taking place.
The value of notes in circulation in Greece doubled from €19 billion in 2009 to €40 billion in September 2011. By the summer of 2012 the total had reached €48 billion, of which at least €10 billion – possibly much more –  had been delivered through secret airlifts.
Typically, developed economies have cash in circulation worth between four and seven per cent of gross domestic product. In 2009 in Greece, the figure was 8.2 per cent. By 2012 it had trebled to 24.8 per cent.
On these numbers, in mid-2012, Greece had a greater value of euro notes in circulation than the Netherlands, even though the Dutch economy is four times that of Greece.
Tens of billions of euros were yanked from Greek banks in the bank runs of 2011 and 2012, yet the authorities estimate only a third of it was spent. Another third was taken abroad for investments in, for example, London property, and a third was hidden under mattresses and floorboards in Greek homes.
It was not long before Greece’s near neighbour and cultural sibling, Cyprus, found that it too was in crisis. This time, Berlin was determined that a large chunk of the bailout would come from savings deposited in Cypriot banks. Bedlam, bank holidays and bank runs were the predictable result. As dusk fell over Nicosia on March 27 this year, the shouts of protesters were drowned out by the angry buzzing of helicopters and deafening wail of police sirens.
Safely kept: Money is seen stored overnight at Central Bank of Cyprus
Safely kept: Money is seen stored overnight at Central Bank of Cyprus
The uproar seemed to be converging on the Central Bank. Had the previous day’s sit-down protest by bank workers turned into a riot?
The truth was much stranger.
At the Central Bank, tense meetings between international financiers, American management consultants, British Treasury advisers and Cypriot bankers suddenly broke off. Four very large green juggernauts laden with euros had arrived from the European Central Bank, just hours before Cyprus’s banks were due to reopen.
An historic just-in-time delivery. That afternoon a Maersk Star Air cargo plane had parked up at the end of the runway at Larnaca airport. Flight logs record that the plane, registration OY-SRH, had flown from Cologne to Munich in the early hours, and then, via Athens, to Larnaca. It was carrying €5 billion euros in notes – not a bailout, but  an epic logistical effort to sate the Cypriot desire for paper money.
The cash had been transferred from the Bundesbank logistical reserve at the request of the ECB. But only after the Cypriot government had done its ‘homework’,  complying with Troika demands for economic and financial reform.
After the notes had been loaded on to the trucks, their journey to Nicosia was accompanied by squads of police cars, while helicopters buzzed overhead. The cash had come courtesy of Cyprus’s real central bank, the one based in Frankfurt, 1,500 miles away – the European Central Bank. Effectively, the ECB’s threat made a week before to pull emergency liquidity funding to the island’s banks was a threat to withhold the cash that arrived on this plane. The consequences would have been dire.
It is perhaps understandable that this and the other cash flights remained clandestine but, in their secrecy and urgency, they offer a window to a still more extraordinary landscape of lies and half-truths told across the continent to keep the single currency alive.
Greece’s membership of the eurozone was, from inception, built on misleading data about the state of its economy. The Cypriot entry in 2008 was waved through, yet only now have the Cypriots been told that their main industry, an offshore banking sector, needs to be dismantled amid fears that it has aided tax evasion and money laundering.
But even these extraordinary lapses pale into insignificance against the two mega lies – untruths in the very structure of the euro – which persist even now, despite the seemingly calmer weather in the currency bloc. A blueprint for revival is being drawn up in the German headquarters of the European Central Bank. The ECB is in absolutely no doubt that the euro will survive.
But the people of the crisis countries – Spain, Portugal, Greece, Cyprus, Italy and Ireland – are yet to be enlightened by their politicians about the price to be paid: in short, the survival of the euro means much lower wages for them. 
To use the jargon, the  Mediterranean countries must be ‘internally devalued’, which means pushing down average wages that had risen sharply, to regain competitiveness and promote growth. The existence of a common currency means, of course, that old-fashioned currency devaluation – the standard method of achieving these things in the past – is impossible.
I know for a fact that two ministers in charge of struggling Mediterranean economies (sadly, they must remain anonymous) are happy to boast about the scale of the cuts in workers’ wages when addressing international bond traders. Would they ever dream of saying this in public? Decisively not.
‘The public would not take it,’ one crisis economy minister tells me.
Meanwhile, even in the final weeks of a German election campaign (which Angela Merkel seems likely to win) the voters remain ignorant that they too must pay a price: that they are about to foot a bill of  billions of euros as Greece heads inexorably for a third bailout.
It will happen safely after the votes are counted, of course.
Germany benefited the most from the introduction of the euro through trade within Europe, a cheaper currency for exports outside Europe, and ultra-low interest rates on its debts. But it now seems inevitable that northern European taxpayers, and German ones in particular, will bear a heavy share of the cost of rescuing the currency.
After all, the northern European taxpayer has effectively replaced bankers in funding Greece’s remaining debts. The first test will come from Greece, which will soon require a remarkable third bailout and yet another default on its debt, having already had the world’s biggest sovereign default in 2012.
This will be just the start of a process where public debts across the eurozone are shared. A de facto  fiscal union and, soon enough, a form of ‘banking union’ will follow.
Underlying all of this will be political union – a super state.
The Maersk Star Air OY-SRH that landed in Larnaca five months ago was the equivalent of a printing press in a nation that had ceded its monetary sovereignty. Such planes are a visible symbol of the loss of national power necessary to prevent the currency itself from crashing.
After the German elections next month, this truth will be revealed. A resumption of the airborne rescue missions is possible; turbulence is guaranteed. Fasten your seatbelts.
This is an edited extract from The Default Line: The Inside Story Of People, Banks And Entire Nations On The Edge, by Faisal Islam, published by Head of Zeus at £15.99. To buy  a copy for £12.49 with free UK p&p, call the Mail Book Shop on 0844 472 4157 or visit mailbookshop.co.uk


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2401410/The-secret-plane-stuffed-cash-saved-euro-When-Greece-burned-banks-melted-EU-talked-tough-threatened-cut-loose--covertly-flooded-10billion.html#ixzz2cxbsCGOh
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Today's post

Jesus Christ, The Same Yesterday, Today and Forever

I had the privilege to be raised in a Christian Home and had the input of my parents and grandparents into my life, they were ...